Re: Re: G92
Posted by
Ray Henry
on 2003-03-07 11:09:19 UTC
> From: "vavaroutsos" <pete@...>Tom Kramer of NIST, the author of the EMC's interpreter describes the
>
> Peter, from what I know the simulation seems correct. On my
> Bridgeport BOSS control it does the same thing (set's the new zero to
> the coordinates specified with no movement). You can envision the G92
> as making a move to the coordinates specified and the making that
> position the absolute zero reference, however, no movement actually
> occurs.
>
> ~petev
effect of a g92 this way, "To make the current point have the coordinates
you want (without motion), program G92 X- Y- Z- A- B- C- , where the axis
words contain the axis numbers you want."
So the critical notion here is that the current location of the tool is
the point that will take on the value that you set using the g92 command.
HTH
Ray
Discussion Thread
Les Watts
2002-07-15 08:18:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92
imserv1
2002-07-15 11:23:13 UTC
Re: G92
Ray Henry
2002-07-15 19:34:49 UTC
Re: Re: Re: G92
Ray Henry
2002-07-15 19:38:49 UTC
Re: Re: G92
Tim Goldstein
2002-07-15 23:03:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G92
Les Watts
2002-07-16 09:05:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G92
Ray Henry
2002-07-16 19:25:46 UTC
Re: Re: Re: G92
Ray Henry
2002-07-16 19:25:48 UTC
Re: RE: G92
Matt Shaver
2002-07-16 20:43:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92
Jon Elson
2002-07-16 21:50:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92
Jon Elson
2002-07-16 22:17:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92
Joel Jacobs
2002-07-17 08:07:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92
Tim Goldstein
2002-07-17 09:42:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G92
Tim Goldstein
2002-07-17 09:46:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G92
Jon Elson
2002-07-17 10:31:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G92
Keith Rumley
2002-07-17 14:15:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92
Matt Shaver
2002-07-17 21:07:46 UTC
EMC Bug List (was G92)
Ray Henry
2003-03-07 11:09:19 UTC
Re: Re: G92
pcfw
2003-03-07 16:54:39 UTC
Re: G92
Ray Henry
2003-03-08 09:42:46 UTC
Re: Re: G92