Re: G92
Posted by
pcfw
on 2003-03-07 16:54:39 UTC
Ray Henry <rehenry@u...> wrote:
N1520 G02 X-17.5 Y10 I0 J9.5
N1530 G00 Z5
N1540 G92 X110 T1 (dia 10mm)
N1550 G01 Y127 X-11.5
So at N1540, the x-coord of the current tool position had been set to
x=110, which means that the program zero is 110 units to the left of
the current tool position.
So N1550 should send the tool to x=-11.5, that is, 110+11.5=122.5
units to the left!
The simulation shows the tool moving approx. 100 units to the right
instead!
Is there another interpretation of G92?
Anyone else using cncsimulator?
Thanks
Peter
> Tom Kramer of NIST, the author of the EMC's interpreter describesthe
> effect of a g92 this way, "To make the current point have thecoordinates
> you want (without motion), program G92 X- Y- Z- A- B- C- , wherethe axis
> words contain the axis numbers you want."tool is
>
> So the critical notion here is that the current location of the
> the point that will take on the value that you set using the g92command.
N1520 G02 X-17.5 Y10 I0 J9.5
N1530 G00 Z5
N1540 G92 X110 T1 (dia 10mm)
N1550 G01 Y127 X-11.5
So at N1540, the x-coord of the current tool position had been set to
x=110, which means that the program zero is 110 units to the left of
the current tool position.
So N1550 should send the tool to x=-11.5, that is, 110+11.5=122.5
units to the left!
The simulation shows the tool moving approx. 100 units to the right
instead!
Is there another interpretation of G92?
Anyone else using cncsimulator?
Thanks
Peter
Discussion Thread
Les Watts
2002-07-15 08:18:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92
imserv1
2002-07-15 11:23:13 UTC
Re: G92
Ray Henry
2002-07-15 19:34:49 UTC
Re: Re: Re: G92
Ray Henry
2002-07-15 19:38:49 UTC
Re: Re: G92
Tim Goldstein
2002-07-15 23:03:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G92
Les Watts
2002-07-16 09:05:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G92
Ray Henry
2002-07-16 19:25:46 UTC
Re: Re: Re: G92
Ray Henry
2002-07-16 19:25:48 UTC
Re: RE: G92
Matt Shaver
2002-07-16 20:43:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92
Jon Elson
2002-07-16 21:50:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92
Jon Elson
2002-07-16 22:17:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92
Joel Jacobs
2002-07-17 08:07:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92
Tim Goldstein
2002-07-17 09:42:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G92
Tim Goldstein
2002-07-17 09:46:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G92
Jon Elson
2002-07-17 10:31:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G92
Keith Rumley
2002-07-17 14:15:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92
Matt Shaver
2002-07-17 21:07:46 UTC
EMC Bug List (was G92)
Ray Henry
2003-03-07 11:09:19 UTC
Re: Re: G92
pcfw
2003-03-07 16:54:39 UTC
Re: G92
Ray Henry
2003-03-08 09:42:46 UTC
Re: Re: G92