Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PC vs PLC

Tim Goldstein wrote:

>My point is that Mach1 is implemented in a way that seems to make the
>best use of XP as a controller. I know your preference is for an
>external box, but the poster was asking how to do it on XP.
>

No "preference" really. As long as something works.

> I think Art
>has shown you do it by implementing a high level kernel driver. You can
>either use his work or do it all on your own.
>
>Ranting about why you do or don't like XP is not helpful at all.
>

Not a "Rant", just telling guys what they might want to expect, or WATCH
FOR if they use XP FOR a CNC controller.

> The OS
>is what it is and you can use it or not as you like.
>

Yet, they SHOULD be aware of such issues that could cause problems ? Or
is that OT ?

. I am fully aware of Art's progress. It is not without "hiccups"
either, or the opportunity to have "hiccups".

Jens has FC, MACH1, M5 and others. His concern was WHAT might be causing
"hiccups".

I covered it far better than telling him to ditch what he has, "RANT"
in your opinion or not.

Sorry if it bothered you.