Re: RE: DRO/cable source
Posted by
A. G. Eckstein
on 2000-02-25 16:30:52 UTC
IMHO, the vynil would be better as I think it has a higher coefficient of
friction. Nylon has a very low one and makes excellent bearings. This can
be especially important where we are dealing with small amounts of friction
surface (180 degrees on a 5mm or smaller diameter). I don't have any tables
in front of me at this time, but its a guess on my part.
Art
At 02:39 AM 02/25/2000 EST, you wrote:
axtein@...
friction. Nylon has a very low one and makes excellent bearings. This can
be especially important where we are dealing with small amounts of friction
surface (180 degrees on a 5mm or smaller diameter). I don't have any tables
in front of me at this time, but its a guess on my part.
Art
At 02:39 AM 02/25/2000 EST, you wrote:
>From: wanliker@...A. G. Eckstein
>
>I just looked in the issue #101 of McMaster Carr, they have coated aircraft
>cable as follows:
>Galvanized.
>7x7 strand 1/16 coated nylon or clear vinyl, breaking strength 270 pounds.
>7x7 strand 3/32 coated nylon or clear vinyl, breaking strength 480 pounds.
>
>Stainless steel, same coatings, same strength, about 25% higher.
>
>Both are indicated as available in cut lengths, 50 foot rolls, or 250 foot
>spools.
>
>Call 1-310-692-5911 for prices, and to order.
>Also on the net, sales@...
>
>My question is which coating would be better??
>bill
axtein@...
Discussion Thread
wanliker@a...
2000-02-24 23:39:42 UTC
Re: RE: DRO/cable source
D.F.S.
2000-02-25 09:04:29 UTC
Re: RE: DRO/cable source
Darrell
2000-02-25 10:22:32 UTC
Re: RE: DRO/cable source
Bertho Boman
2000-02-25 11:05:28 UTC
Re: RE: DRO/cable source
Darrell
2000-02-25 15:40:01 UTC
Re: RE: DRO/cable source
A. G. Eckstein
2000-02-25 16:30:52 UTC
Re: RE: DRO/cable source
A. G. Eckstein
2000-02-25 16:51:26 UTC
Re: RE: DRO/cable source