Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rtlinux-2.0
Posted by
George Fouse
on 2000-03-07 10:19:54 UTC
Hi Matt,
I built rt2.0 (2.2.13 kernel) without SMP support. It works fine for my
primary uses. I noted after the fact that INSTALL.phil had it enabled as
an example.
One thing you do need to note, though, is that EMC defines the __SMP__
flag, which will generate unresolved references (actually localized to
one .h file) if the kernel is built without SMP. I undefined __SMP__ and
EMC built fine. I haven't thoroughly tested it, though.
George
Matt Shaver wrote:
George Fouse,
President
G F I Consulting
-------------------------------
I built rt2.0 (2.2.13 kernel) without SMP support. It works fine for my
primary uses. I noted after the fact that INSTALL.phil had it enabled as
an example.
One thing you do need to note, though, is that EMC defines the __SMP__
flag, which will generate unresolved references (actually localized to
one .h file) if the kernel is built without SMP. I undefined __SMP__ and
EMC built fine. I haven't thoroughly tested it, though.
George
Matt Shaver wrote:
>-------------------------------
> I don't think so, but I'm in the process of doing what you've done (get
> RTL2.0 going for the EMC) and I'll let you know how it goes for me. Did you
> mean that SMP support was turned on in that particular example, or that it
> was turned on in the .config file for the pre-patched kernel?
>
> Matt
George Fouse,
President
G F I Consulting
-------------------------------
Discussion Thread
Matt Shaver
2000-03-07 09:24:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rtlinux-2.0
Joel Jacobs
2000-03-07 09:48:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rtlinux-2.0
George Fouse
2000-03-07 10:19:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rtlinux-2.0
Joel Jacobs
2000-03-08 11:10:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rtlinux-2.0
jguenthe
2000-03-08 11:42:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rtlinux-2.0
Joel Jacobs
2000-03-08 11:52:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rtlinux-2.0
George Fouse
2000-03-08 12:21:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] rtlinux-2.0