CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: wire question

on 2003-05-28 15:18:49 UTC
Thanks,

That makes total sense and it also makes it easier to ifentify what
is where.

Putting my stepper wires in one cable and power in another and low
voltage in a third is a little more costly in wires, but is eassier
to implement as lower count conductors are more available and I can
use lower gauge wire. a 25 conductor bundle seems a little large to
bend in the machine.

Assuming all 3 are shielded, then there is no problem with putting
them all in the same cable chain.

sound better ?

Dave




--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, JanRwl@A... wrote:
> In a message dated 5/28/2003 4:33:18 PM Central Standard Time,
> davemucha@j... writes:
>
> > and a 26 conductor, foil shieled for the rest of the stuff. That
> > would put the stepper in the same bundle as the low voltage stuff.
> >
>
> Dave! I mis-read you, first time, I guess! The "signal stuff"
should NOT be
> in the same bundle as the stepper-motor wires! Those are the
WORST! It'd
> even be better if the low-voltage "signal" wires were in the same
bundle with
> the AC, rather than the stepper wires! A CHOPPED square-wave is
MUCH
> electrically-noisier than a sine-wave AC!!!!!
>
> You miay-well be better off SRIPPING this cable you have, and
making-up a
> "custom run" with the signal-wires shielded under a SEPARATE shield
from that of
> the stepper-wires! For the one giant machine I made, I used
Gortite flexible
> cable-track things, which itself is a shield, though it doesn't
SEPARATE
> motor-wires from others.
>
> I kept MY signal wires separate, and used tiny DC-relays for the
> "limit-switches", so that the DC-lines for those relays were not
the "same" as the actual
> 74HCnn lines.
>
> I am having trouble "entering" my "forums" on AOL, so I can't re-
check if I
> have filed a photo of this on PHOTOS or FILES on the CCED site.
AOL is summin,
> some days!
>
> Jan Rowland
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Discussion Thread

turbulatordude 2003-05-28 12:23:52 UTC wire question JanRwl@A... 2003-05-28 12:58:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] wire question turbulatordude 2003-05-28 14:10:01 UTC Re: wire question JanRwl@A... 2003-05-28 14:53:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wire question turbulatordude 2003-05-28 15:18:49 UTC Re: wire question JanRwl@A... 2003-05-28 16:27:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wire question David A. Frantz 2003-05-28 17:42:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] wire question Jon Elson 2003-05-28 22:06:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] wire question turbulatordude 2003-05-29 05:47:58 UTC Re: wire question - another question AMPS JanRwl@A... 2003-05-29 13:48:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: wire question - another question AMPS