Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Choice of Mill
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-06-04 10:58:43 UTC
MDS1878 wrote:
claims this works like a charm. it would require that the base of the
machine be firmly bolted to something that is essentially unmovable.
If the machine is bolted to a massive bench, and throws a beam
10 feet or more to the wall, that should make for fairly good alignment.
It depends, of course, on what precision you are trying to get.
Jon
>I've used a variety of machines, and the one big thing I want to sayIt seems a little hokey to me, but there is someone on the list who
>is that you need some way of adjusting the distance between the head
>and the table without losing the XY position. Any machine where the
>head Swivels around a round column loses the alignment between the
>table and work piece whenever you unclamp the head to raise or lower
>It. If the machine you are looking at does not have a knee (like a
>Bridgeport) and has a round column, you will have this problem, and
>it will drive you nuts!
>
>Jon
>
>An outstanding point and one I had not considered! If I fab a
>bracket install a laser pointer and a set point for alignment. Do
>you think this will resolve the problem?
>
>
claims this works like a charm. it would require that the base of the
machine be firmly bolted to something that is essentially unmovable.
If the machine is bolted to a massive bench, and throws a beam
10 feet or more to the wall, that should make for fairly good alignment.
It depends, of course, on what precision you are trying to get.
Jon
Discussion Thread
MDS1878
2003-06-03 00:10:59 UTC
Choice of Mill
turbulatordude
2003-06-03 06:05:27 UTC
Re: Choice of Mill
Jon Elson
2003-06-03 09:03:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Choice of Mill
MDS1878
2003-06-03 20:16:05 UTC
Re: Choice of Mill
Jon Elson
2003-06-04 10:58:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Choice of Mill
turbulatordude
2003-06-04 12:26:04 UTC
Re: Choice of Mill
mayfieldtm
2003-06-05 08:17:13 UTC
Re: Choice of Mill