different feed rates ( was Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2003-07-05 07:54:14 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Alan Marconett KM6VV
<KM6VV@a...> wrote:
holes was in one direction, that the backlash would have been taken
up on the first hole and from there on out, there would not be a time
difference based soley on which way the table was moving.
IIRC, it was a post on the TurboCNC list within the last year about
speeds.
The point I was making was that if you need to gain some speed, test
things in different ways.
Dave
<KM6VV@a...> wrote:
> Hi Dave,short.
>
> Isn't this rapid back in X to keep the backlash out? If it was a
> regular pattern of holes, such as a tooling plate, then the simple Y
> move, an not the rapid X AND a Y move, would have been about as
> Unless the pattern is not regular?Had he not posted, I would also think that since all moton between
>
> Alan KM6VV
holes was in one direction, that the backlash would have been taken
up on the first hole and from there on out, there would not be a time
difference based soley on which way the table was moving.
IIRC, it was a post on the TurboCNC list within the last year about
speeds.
The point I was making was that if you need to gain some speed, test
things in different ways.
Dave
>cuts
>
> turbulatordude wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> > >I found for some
> > > reason the torch works better making clockwise (left to right)
> > > than the opposite...go figure. You definitely want to use aseries
> > > controller software that supports continuous contouring and
> > smoothes
> > > out the movements.
> >
> > I saw a post some time ago from someone who was making a few
> > of holes. they ran the X axis then drilled, moved again, drilled,the
> > and so on till the end of the row, then moved the Y and reversed
> > X direction.X
> >
> > by doing a rapid back to the X starting point and only moving the
> > in one direction, they decreased their time per partsignifigantly.
> >
> > go figure.
> >
> > Dave
Discussion Thread
Jay
2003-07-03 07:49:35 UTC
NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
Robert Campbell
2003-07-03 08:02:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
Jay
2003-07-03 10:35:36 UTC
Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
Robert Campbell
2003-07-03 11:51:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
caudlet
2003-07-03 12:40:20 UTC
Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
Jay
2003-07-03 14:51:30 UTC
Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
alex
2003-07-03 15:11:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
caudlet
2003-07-03 15:41:52 UTC
Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
Charles Knight
2003-07-03 20:15:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
alex
2003-07-03 20:19:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
caudlet
2003-07-03 21:11:07 UTC
Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
Jay
2003-07-03 21:16:21 UTC
Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
caudlet
2003-07-03 21:30:57 UTC
Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
Jay
2003-07-03 21:34:32 UTC
Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
caudlet
2003-07-03 21:50:38 UTC
Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
turbulatordude
2003-07-03 22:11:02 UTC
different feed rates ( was Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2003-07-04 09:53:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] different feed rates ( was Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
alex
2003-07-04 10:44:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s
turbulatordude
2003-07-05 07:54:14 UTC
different feed rates ( was Re: NEWBIE WITH PLASMA/ROUTER ??'s