Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dumb question on TTL control of a relay from parallel p...
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2003-09-09 09:59:01 UTC
In a message dated 9/9/2003 8:27:40 AM Central Standard Time,
jeff@... writes:
SEVERAL of those relays connected in parallel. A miniature reed-relay might
"theoretically" work (so long as the proper "spark suppression diode" is used
across it), but when controlling heavier loads, SOME very tiny reed-contacts will
WELD. But perhaps not with an INDUCTIVE load? The ULN2003 is a better idea.
An alternative with only TWO "relay drivers" is the 75477 8-pin DIP.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
jeff@... writes:
> If the above current is too high, is it best to try to find aJeff: The ULN2003 has SEVEN Darlingtons, any ONE of which could control
> miniature reed relay to control the coil of the "power relay" or is
> there a better way?
>
SEVERAL of those relays connected in parallel. A miniature reed-relay might
"theoretically" work (so long as the proper "spark suppression diode" is used
across it), but when controlling heavier loads, SOME very tiny reed-contacts will
WELD. But perhaps not with an INDUCTIVE load? The ULN2003 is a better idea.
An alternative with only TWO "relay drivers" is the 75477 8-pin DIP.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
JanRwl@A...
2003-09-09 09:59:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dumb question on TTL control of a relay from parallel p...
washcomp
2003-09-09 10:14:33 UTC
Re: Dumb question on TTL control of a relay from parallel p...