Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inverse of G-code
Posted by
W. P. McGown
on 2003-09-19 09:00:58 UTC
Thanks to all for suggestions. For those interested in such things the one
by Carlos seems the best for this project -- use only one mold/die and a
urethane pressure pad.
Alan's suggestion of going back to the CAD package and doing the tool paths
there is probably the one I will use if the urethane pressure pad does not
work out.
The WORST POSSIBLE solution is to hand code it!! The little example given
below took over 30 minutes!! (So I am a code wimp! ;-) ) and the
design/mold I am working with is much more complicated!
For those curious here is a sample that I did to get the feel for the job.
The first G-code cuts the positive mold. The second cuts the negative
negative mold.
{program1 start}
;---------------------------------------
G00 Z.1
G00 X.5 Y1
G00 Z-.05
G01 Y.5
G02 X1 Y.5 R.25
G01 Y.375
G03 X.5 Y.375 R.25
G01 X.375
G01 Y1
G00 Z.1
G00 X0 Y0
M02
And now the other one while maintaining a .125" clearance around the
previous design:
{program2 start}
;---------------------------------------
G00 X.125 Y1.1875
G01 Z-.05
G01 Y.1875
G01 X.75
G01 Y.375
G01 Y.1875
G01 X1.25
G01 Y.5
G03 X.75 Y1 R.5
G01 Y1.1875
G01 X.125
G00 Z.1
{stuff deleted that cuts around the outside of this path and the next 3 }
Thanks again for all the help/suggestions.
Bill
by Carlos seems the best for this project -- use only one mold/die and a
urethane pressure pad.
Alan's suggestion of going back to the CAD package and doing the tool paths
there is probably the one I will use if the urethane pressure pad does not
work out.
The WORST POSSIBLE solution is to hand code it!! The little example given
below took over 30 minutes!! (So I am a code wimp! ;-) ) and the
design/mold I am working with is much more complicated!
For those curious here is a sample that I did to get the feel for the job.
The first G-code cuts the positive mold. The second cuts the negative
negative mold.
{program1 start}
;---------------------------------------
G00 Z.1
G00 X.5 Y1
G00 Z-.05
G01 Y.5
G02 X1 Y.5 R.25
G01 Y.375
G03 X.5 Y.375 R.25
G01 X.375
G01 Y1
G00 Z.1
G00 X0 Y0
M02
And now the other one while maintaining a .125" clearance around the
previous design:
{program2 start}
;---------------------------------------
G00 X.125 Y1.1875
G01 Z-.05
G01 Y.1875
G01 X.75
G01 Y.375
G01 Y.1875
G01 X1.25
G01 Y.5
G03 X.75 Y1 R.5
G01 Y1.1875
G01 X.125
G00 Z.1
{stuff deleted that cuts around the outside of this path and the next 3 }
Thanks again for all the help/suggestions.
Bill
Discussion Thread
W. P. McGown
2003-09-18 10:22:45 UTC
Inverse of G-code
David Paulson
2003-09-18 11:28:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inverse of G-code
ccq@x...
2003-09-18 11:45:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inverse of G-code
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2003-09-18 12:55:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inverse of G-code
Carlos Guillermo
2003-09-18 14:35:06 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inverse of G-code
W. P. McGown
2003-09-18 14:54:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inverse of G-code
Chuck Knight
2003-09-18 15:31:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inverse of G-code
Carlos Guillermo
2003-09-18 15:36:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inverse of G-code
Tim Goldstein
2003-09-18 15:57:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inverse of G-code
Raymond Heckert
2003-09-18 21:16:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inverse of G-code
Erie Patsellis
2003-09-18 21:43:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inverse of G-code
W. P. McGown
2003-09-19 09:00:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inverse of G-code
Zafar Salam
2003-09-19 20:50:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Inverse of G-code