Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: estimating current of a per supply
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-10-01 23:07:25 UTC
Markwayne wrote:
winding from
getting too small, the center "leg" often has more area that the sum of
the two
outer legs. So, measuring an outer leg and doubling it is both easier and
may be more accurate.
these calculations.
Jon
>The cross sectional area of the core is the limiting factor as to howThis relationship ought to be linear. Also, to keep the ID of the
>mush flux at saturation the xfmr can handle. The "core" is only the bit
> in the center that passes thru the windings. An area of say two sq.
>in. is about a 100 watt and 3 sqin about 250 watt and 4 sqin 500 watt.
>
winding from
getting too small, the center "leg" often has more area that the sum of
the two
outer legs. So, measuring an outer leg and doubling it is both easier and
may be more accurate.
>This does not consider the duty cycle the rest of the xfmr is designedYes, knowing the design standards the transformer was made to can affect
>for. Xfmers designed to be saturated continuous duty you can boil water
>on. Weight is a good indicator as well, and some where I have a chart....
>
>
these calculations.
Jon
Discussion Thread
carlcnc
2003-10-01 15:20:50 UTC
estimating current of a per supply
turbulatordude
2003-10-01 17:05:05 UTC
Re: estimating current of a per supply
Markwayne
2003-10-01 18:14:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: estimating current of a per supply
Jon Elson
2003-10-01 22:59:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] estimating current of a per supply
Jon Elson
2003-10-01 23:07:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: estimating current of a per supply
JanRwl@A...
2003-10-01 23:17:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] estimating current of a per supply