Re: poor mans digitizing gizmo
Posted by
jchrisj7734
on 2003-10-11 15:58:48 UTC
If you've seen the digitizer pads that are used on some computers,
they use a signal swept across a fairly coarse (0.1" or so) grid on
both sides of a PC board. (The X axis is on one side Y is on the
other). The pickup coil in the stylus or puck "sees" the signal come
past and the circuitry imterpolates the crossing point.
I don't see how to practically do this on a skin top, BUT there is
another technology that might work and should even be adaptable to
mounting directly on a mill (Therby dragging this message back in the
general vicinity of the topic.)
It uses either three strip microphones or 3 pairs of microphones
arrayed on the X, Y, and Z axis. The stylus makes a noise from a spark
gap or ultrasonic transducer and you measure the time it takes for the
sound to get to the various microphones. The resolution and range is a
function of the counting frequency and the size of the counting register.
This type of digitizer **could** be free-standing or even mounted on a
mill. If you handled the frequencies properly you might even be able
to use it for feedback, although getting to a useful resolution might
be a trick, not to mention the delay involved.
I could certainly see making a digitizer arm using this technology.
Chris
they use a signal swept across a fairly coarse (0.1" or so) grid on
both sides of a PC board. (The X axis is on one side Y is on the
other). The pickup coil in the stylus or puck "sees" the signal come
past and the circuitry imterpolates the crossing point.
I don't see how to practically do this on a skin top, BUT there is
another technology that might work and should even be adaptable to
mounting directly on a mill (Therby dragging this message back in the
general vicinity of the topic.)
It uses either three strip microphones or 3 pairs of microphones
arrayed on the X, Y, and Z axis. The stylus makes a noise from a spark
gap or ultrasonic transducer and you measure the time it takes for the
sound to get to the various microphones. The resolution and range is a
function of the counting frequency and the size of the counting register.
This type of digitizer **could** be free-standing or even mounted on a
mill. If you handled the frequencies properly you might even be able
to use it for feedback, although getting to a useful resolution might
be a trick, not to mention the delay involved.
I could certainly see making a digitizer arm using this technology.
Chris
Discussion Thread
Jens Swales
2003-10-09 14:11:47 UTC
poor mans digitizing gizmo
afogassa
2003-10-09 15:58:45 UTC
Re: poor mans digitizing gizmo
Harvey White
2003-10-09 16:08:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] poor mans digitizing gizmo
John Johnson
2003-10-09 16:43:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] poor mans digitizing gizmo
Graham Stabler
2003-10-09 17:08:20 UTC
Re: poor mans digitizing gizmo
Graham Stabler
2003-10-09 17:10:31 UTC
Re: poor mans digitizing gizmo
Chuck Knight
2003-10-09 23:30:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: poor mans digitizing gizmo
John Johnson
2003-10-10 07:51:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: poor mans digitizing gizmo
jchrisj7734
2003-10-11 15:58:48 UTC
Re: poor mans digitizing gizmo
Chuck Knight
2003-10-12 08:53:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: poor mans digitizing gizmo
Graham Stabler
2003-10-12 10:41:35 UTC
Re: poor mans digitizing gizmo
ballendo
2003-10-20 00:40:48 UTC
Re: poor mans digitizing gizmo