Re: Rotor inertia.
Posted by
Mariss Freimanis
on 2003-10-31 07:27:57 UTC
Be careful with "low-inertia" motors for another reason entirely.
Oftentimes they are unsuitable for use with switching type drives.
Motor inertia is reduced by eliminating the laminated steel armature,
leaving only the windings, which are wound in such a way as to be
self-supporting.
The absence of iron also reduces motor inductance dramatically and
that is bad if the motor is used with a switching type drive. Almost
all high power drives are switching type (PWM).
Compare two motors:
One is a low-inertia with an armature inductance of 100uH. The other
is a standard motor having 5mH of inductance. Both have similar specs
otherwise and will be run at 48VDC using a 25kHz switching drive.
The 25kHz ripple current thru the standard motor will be:
I = V / (2L * f) = 48V / (2 * .005 H * 25,000 Hz) = 0.192A
The low inertia motor:
I = 48V / (2 * .0001 H * 25,000 Hz) = 9.6A!
The standard motor will stay nice and cool while the "low-inertia"
motor will probably burn down with nearly 10A of current passing thru
it continuously.
It would require large inductors in series with the motor in order to
use it.
Mariss
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Jason Cox" <sinergy@o...>
wrote:
Oftentimes they are unsuitable for use with switching type drives.
Motor inertia is reduced by eliminating the laminated steel armature,
leaving only the windings, which are wound in such a way as to be
self-supporting.
The absence of iron also reduces motor inductance dramatically and
that is bad if the motor is used with a switching type drive. Almost
all high power drives are switching type (PWM).
Compare two motors:
One is a low-inertia with an armature inductance of 100uH. The other
is a standard motor having 5mH of inductance. Both have similar specs
otherwise and will be run at 48VDC using a 25kHz switching drive.
The 25kHz ripple current thru the standard motor will be:
I = V / (2L * f) = 48V / (2 * .005 H * 25,000 Hz) = 0.192A
The low inertia motor:
I = 48V / (2 * .0001 H * 25,000 Hz) = 9.6A!
The standard motor will stay nice and cool while the "low-inertia"
motor will probably burn down with nearly 10A of current passing thru
it continuously.
It would require large inductors in series with the motor in order to
use it.
Mariss
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Jason Cox" <sinergy@o...>
wrote:
> Sorry Jon, I meant the lower inertia ones were more expensive.rotor inertia
>
> Regards,
>
> Jason Cox.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jon Elson <elson@p...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 5:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotor inertia.
>
>
> >
> >
> > Jason Cox wrote:
> >
> > >Hello All,
> > >
> > >Just wondering when selecting servo motors what impact does
> have on the final function of a cnc machine?cheaper, but
> > >
> > >>From my research motors with a far lower inertia are much
> does this really matter. Surely the redution in inertia of therotor would
> be minimal say compared to the inertia of the machine table.that I
> > >
> > >
> > Yes, essentially correct. Mariss Freimanis did some calculations
> > seem tomotors come
> > recall showed that it is not insignificant, but that common
> > out inmuch, or too
> > the right range. Under some circumstances, a motor with too
> > little inertia can make for an unstable servo system. This isespecially
> athe
> > problem when there is some springy element between the motor and
> > high-inertia load, such as a long thin leadscrew or couplingswith too
> muchconnected by a
> > flex. You end up with a system comparable to two masses
> > spring.some low
> >
> > Are you sure low-inertia motors are cheaper? I happen to have
> > inertia Yaskawa super minertia motors that supposedly cost $5000each.
> > They were in computer tape drives, and had a fiber compositecapstan
> > with Beryllium hub, a ceramic shaft, ironless rotor motor ofthe "thimble"
> > style, etc. But, in general, a low inertia motor of conventionalcheaper to
> > construction
> > is just smaller, that's all. So, a smaller motor qould be
> make.wanliker@a...,
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com,
> timg@k...reach it if
> > Moderator: pentam@c... indigo_red@q... [Moderators]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> you have trouble.to be a
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members arethere, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.POSTING THEM.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> >
> >
Discussion Thread
Jason Cox
2003-10-30 16:08:22 UTC
Rotor inertia.
Mariss Freimanis
2003-10-30 17:09:50 UTC
Re: Rotor inertia.
Leslie M. Watts
2003-10-30 17:34:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotor inertia.
Jason Cox
2003-10-30 18:05:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotor inertia.
Leslie M. Watts
2003-10-30 18:32:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotor inertia.
Jason Cox
2003-10-30 18:43:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-10-30 22:18:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotor inertia.
Jason Cox
2003-10-30 22:34:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotor inertia.
Mariss Freimanis
2003-10-31 07:27:57 UTC
Re: Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-10-31 10:50:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotor inertia.
Mariss Freimanis
2003-10-31 12:26:55 UTC
Re: Rotor inertia.
kimvellore
2003-10-31 16:50:38 UTC
Re: Rotor inertia.
Mariss Freimanis
2003-10-31 19:09:52 UTC
Re: Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-10-31 23:38:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-10-31 23:42:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotor inertia.
ajv2803959
2003-11-03 12:51:09 UTC
Re: Rotor inertia.
ballendo
2003-11-04 04:01:16 UTC
Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-11-04 09:19:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.
Mariss Freimanis
2003-11-04 11:09:54 UTC
Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-11-04 22:19:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.
Tim Goldstein
2003-11-04 22:25:12 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.
Mariss Freimanis
2003-11-04 23:16:11 UTC
Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-11-05 09:02:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.