Re: Rotor inertia.
Posted by
kimvellore
on 2003-10-31 16:50:38 UTC
Mariss,
My 2C on this subject. The heat generated in a inductor is due to
the resistance or due to eddie current. For the low-inertia both
would be small, hence the heat generated due to the increased current
should in theory be less then in regular motors... what do you think?
Kim
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Mariss Freimanis"
<mariss92705@y...> wrote:
My 2C on this subject. The heat generated in a inductor is due to
the resistance or due to eddie current. For the low-inertia both
would be small, hence the heat generated due to the increased current
should in theory be less then in regular motors... what do you think?
Kim
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Mariss Freimanis"
<mariss92705@y...> wrote:
> Be careful with "low-inertia" motors for another reason entirely.armature,
> Oftentimes they are unsuitable for use with switching type drives.
>
> Motor inertia is reduced by eliminating the laminated steel
> leaving only the windings, which are wound in such a way as to beAlmost
> self-supporting.
>
> The absence of iron also reduces motor inductance dramatically and
> that is bad if the motor is used with a switching type drive.
> all high power drives are switching type (PWM).other
>
> Compare two motors:
>
> One is a low-inertia with an armature inductance of 100uH. The
> is a standard motor having 5mH of inductance. Both have similarspecs
> otherwise and will be run at 48VDC using a 25kHz switching drive.thru
>
> The 25kHz ripple current thru the standard motor will be:
>
> I = V / (2L * f) = 48V / (2 * .005 H * 25,000 Hz) = 0.192A
>
> The low inertia motor:
>
> I = 48V / (2 * .0001 H * 25,000 Hz) = 9.6A!
>
> The standard motor will stay nice and cool while the "low-inertia"
> motor will probably burn down with nearly 10A of current passing
> it continuously.to
>
> It would require large inductors in series with the motor in order
> use it.
>
> Mariss
>
Discussion Thread
Jason Cox
2003-10-30 16:08:22 UTC
Rotor inertia.
Mariss Freimanis
2003-10-30 17:09:50 UTC
Re: Rotor inertia.
Leslie M. Watts
2003-10-30 17:34:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotor inertia.
Jason Cox
2003-10-30 18:05:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotor inertia.
Leslie M. Watts
2003-10-30 18:32:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotor inertia.
Jason Cox
2003-10-30 18:43:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-10-30 22:18:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotor inertia.
Jason Cox
2003-10-30 22:34:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Rotor inertia.
Mariss Freimanis
2003-10-31 07:27:57 UTC
Re: Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-10-31 10:50:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotor inertia.
Mariss Freimanis
2003-10-31 12:26:55 UTC
Re: Rotor inertia.
kimvellore
2003-10-31 16:50:38 UTC
Re: Rotor inertia.
Mariss Freimanis
2003-10-31 19:09:52 UTC
Re: Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-10-31 23:38:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-10-31 23:42:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotor inertia.
ajv2803959
2003-11-03 12:51:09 UTC
Re: Rotor inertia.
ballendo
2003-11-04 04:01:16 UTC
Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-11-04 09:19:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.
Mariss Freimanis
2003-11-04 11:09:54 UTC
Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-11-04 22:19:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.
Tim Goldstein
2003-11-04 22:25:12 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.
Mariss Freimanis
2003-11-04 23:16:11 UTC
Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.
Jon Elson
2003-11-05 09:02:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Filters, and a ? for Mariss was Re: Rotor inertia.