Re: serial vs parallel port
Posted by
rotarysmp
on 2003-11-06 02:01:25 UTC
This is what the G2002 is for. Your PC software reads the G code and
outputs motion commands via the USB port. The G2002 buffers these
motion commands, generates the real time coordinated Step/dir signals
and outputs these commands to the driver board. Allows you to run the
g-code translation software on a non-real time OS (like windoze).
Mark
outputs motion commands via the USB port. The G2002 buffers these
motion commands, generates the real time coordinated Step/dir signals
and outputs these commands to the driver board. Allows you to run the
g-code translation software on a non-real time OS (like windoze).
Mark
Discussion Thread
Don Rogers
2003-11-04 22:36:02 UTC
Re: serial vs parallel port
ccq@x...
2003-11-04 23:25:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: serial vs parallel port
Jon Elson
2003-11-05 09:17:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: serial vs parallel port
ccq@x...
2003-11-05 11:06:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: serial vs parallel port
Don Rogers
2003-11-05 22:46:13 UTC
Re: serial vs parallel port
ccq@x...
2003-11-05 23:49:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: serial vs parallel port
rotarysmp
2003-11-06 02:01:25 UTC
Re: serial vs parallel port
ccq@x...
2003-11-06 03:25:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: serial vs parallel port
rotarysmp
2003-11-07 05:40:58 UTC
Re: serial vs parallel port
ccq@x...
2003-11-07 09:56:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: serial vs parallel port
hawse27
2003-11-16 17:56:32 UTC
Re: serial vs parallel port