Re: Long X axis Method of travel.
Posted by
dex367
on 2003-11-14 07:53:51 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Campbell" <bob@c...>
wrote:
inches long, the Y axis 36 inches long and the Z axis 20 inches long.
This will hang over head an A axis that will will rotate in parallel
with the X axis. I plan to build life scale wood sculptures. This
is why I was wondering about what would be the best way of moving the
X axis.
Another thought, could it be better if I ran two systems on the same
X axis? Have two Y and Z run on the same X axis. The computer would
have to coordinate the two to keep them from hitting each other and
would have to work on the same A axis surface. This would keep the
length of travel down to say 50 inches. That would be good enough
for a lead screw. Then the time to take for machining would be cut
in half.
Dex
Dex
wrote:
> Jon,take 8' of
>
> None of my builders are building anything over 50" long. It does
> space. In reality a Gantry machine would take at least 6' ofspace. Once
> you get past 4' then a gantry machine would win out.I am currently designing a overhead 4 axis system with the X axis 96
>
> For a lot of people 3' by 2' of cutting area is plenty.
>
> Bob Campbell
>
inches long, the Y axis 36 inches long and the Z axis 20 inches long.
This will hang over head an A axis that will will rotate in parallel
with the X axis. I plan to build life scale wood sculptures. This
is why I was wondering about what would be the best way of moving the
X axis.
Another thought, could it be better if I ran two systems on the same
X axis? Have two Y and Z run on the same X axis. The computer would
have to coordinate the two to keep them from hitting each other and
would have to work on the same A axis surface. This would keep the
length of travel down to say 50 inches. That would be good enough
for a lead screw. Then the time to take for machining would be cut
in half.
Dex
Dex
Discussion Thread
dex367
2003-11-13 07:27:30 UTC
Long X axis Method of travel.
Erie Patsellis
2003-11-13 07:31:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Long X axis Method of travel.
Robert Campbell
2003-11-13 07:43:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Long X axis Method of travel.
Miroslav Pejic
2003-11-13 08:14:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Long X axis Method of travel.
Jon Elson
2003-11-13 09:14:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Long X axis Method of travel.
Robert Campbell
2003-11-13 10:16:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Long X axis Method of travel.
Miroslav Pejic
2003-11-13 10:46:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Long X axis Method of travel.
Miroslav Pejic
2003-11-13 10:47:39 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Long X axis Method of travel.
Robert Campbell
2003-11-13 11:41:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Long X axis Method of travel.
dex367
2003-11-13 15:55:12 UTC
Re: Long X axis Method of travel.
dex367
2003-11-13 15:57:34 UTC
Re: Long X axis Method of travel.
Jon Elson
2003-11-13 21:06:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Long X axis Method of travel.
Robert Campbell
2003-11-13 21:17:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Long X axis Method of travel.
Jon Elson
2003-11-13 21:19:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Long X axis Method of travel.
JanRwl@A...
2003-11-13 23:29:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Long X axis Method of travel.
ajv2803959
2003-11-14 05:03:36 UTC
Re: Long X axis Method of travel.
James Cullins
2003-11-14 05:27:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Long X axis Method of travel.
dex367
2003-11-14 07:53:51 UTC
Re: Long X axis Method of travel.
Pat Bearss
2003-11-14 08:25:02 UTC
Re: Long X axis Method of travel.
JanRwl@A...
2003-11-14 21:29:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Long X axis Method of travel.
dex367
2003-11-17 06:56:40 UTC
Re: Long X axis Method of travel.