Re: Question on remote VFD panel usage
Posted by
vavaroutsos
on 2003-11-21 23:28:23 UTC
On the FM100 drives there is a header inside which is logic level
RS232/RS485. The drivers are added externally. The drive can be
programed with PC based software and can also be controlled throught
this interface. I have the documentation for the control protocol.
I'm not sure about the MA7200 as I have not used one. Westinghouse is
pretty helpfull. I'm sure you can get the information you need from
them if you call them.
~petev
RS232/RS485. The drivers are added externally. The drive can be
programed with PC based software and can also be controlled throught
this interface. I have the documentation for the control protocol.
I'm not sure about the MA7200 as I have not used one. Westinghouse is
pretty helpfull. I'm sure you can get the information you need from
them if you call them.
~petev
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "washcomp" <jeff@w...> wrote:
> Dealer's web site lists this price. I was figuring on configuring
> it from the front panel (it has two lines of text vs. the few
> characters of the other model. The removable front panel is
> interfaced RS-232, but I haven't found any documentation about how
> to program through this port.
>
> Regards,
> Jeff
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "vavaroutsos" <pete@v...>
> wrote:
> > The MA7200 hundred looks like a good drive for only $20 more in
> 2HP
> > (where are you getting it for this price?). However, the spec
> sheet
> > only mentions RS-485 so you may need an RS-485 port on your PC to
> > configure/control it.
> >
> > ~petev
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "washcomp" <jeff@w...>
> wrote:
> > > Actually I was looking at the Teco MA7200 which (for a 2 HP
VFD)
> > > only costs about $20 more than the FM100. If there is a
> > > disadvantage to the MA7200 drive, please let me know.
> > >
> > > As for Harold & Dealers, they are great people, know them for
> > > years. (They are located at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, we're
> located
> > > at the Brooklyn Army Terminal)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "vavaroutsos"
> <pete@v...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Do you really need a vector drive? The Teco FM100 series is
> > priced
> > > > much more reasonably. You can use the serial port to control
> it
> > > from
> > > > the PC. The line drivers are not built into the FM100 so you
> need
> > > to
> > > > add external RS232/RS422/RS485 drivers. Teco includes a small
> > > > external driver box with their programming software. You can
> get
> > > the
> > > > drives and software new from:
> > > >
> > > > www.dealerselectric.com
> > > >
> > > > Ask for Harold.
> > > >
> > > > You can remote the control panel, but the cable is expensive
> from
> > > > Teco and a pain to build yourself. You can also use an
> external
> > > > analog pot for speed control or digital inputs for fixed
> speeds.
> > > >
> > > > ~petev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "washcomp"
<jeff@w...>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > As some of you are aware, I've been fine tuning a design
for
> a
> > > > > control pendant using a keyboard emulator.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've been looking at variable frequency drives for my motor
> and
> > > > came
> > > > > across the MA7200 series by Teco-Westinghouse:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.tecowestinghouse.com/PDF/Ma7200.pdf
> > > > >
> > > > > It's got sensorless vector, pulse train, a bunch of I/O's
> and a
> > > > > remoteable control panel.
> > > > > Does anyone have any experience with this drive?
> > > > > Does anyone have any feedback on the idea to use the remote
> > > panel
> > > > > attached to the pendant instead of some of the "hard"
> > switches?
> > > Is
> > > > > there a way to use the analog (or relay contact) outputs to
> > > > indicate
> > > > > the speed changes to MACH2? Especially if this can be done
> in
> > > > > conjunction with the forward/reverse indication to MACH2,
it
> > > would
> > > > > reduce the switch clutter on the pendant and provide an
> > > attractive
> > > > > alternative to the motor control functions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone ever try this (or is it pie in the sky)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Jeff
Discussion Thread
washcomp
2003-11-14 13:42:09 UTC
Question on remote VFD panel usage
Kim Lux
2003-11-14 14:35:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question on remote VFD panel usage
vavaroutsos
2003-11-16 12:47:29 UTC
Re: Question on remote VFD panel usage
washcomp
2003-11-16 22:03:40 UTC
Re: Question on remote VFD panel usage
Bill P @ ...
2003-11-17 14:33:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question on remote VFD panel usage
vavaroutsos
2003-11-21 16:38:47 UTC
Re: Question on remote VFD panel usage
washcomp
2003-11-21 17:20:58 UTC
Re: Question on remote VFD panel usage
vavaroutsos
2003-11-21 23:28:23 UTC
Re: Question on remote VFD panel usage