Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet more DRO
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-04-13 12:14:51 UTC
"D.F.S." wrote:
might be nice.
I have resolution of .00005" (~ .00127mm, or 1.27 uM) on my CNC X and Y
axes right now, and it
is just about enough to get smooth circles interpolated. I DEFINITELY
would not want
to go any lower than that.
Jon
> > Renishaw are also marketing a flexible steel scale. Using aFor a DRO, this should be FINE. For a CNC, however, more resolution
> quadrature read
> > head, a 10 micron resolution is also possible.
> >
> > I'm trying to get a sample of Newall's tape to play around with - if
> I can get
> > the time at work. It should be possible to achive a higher
> resolution by using
> > multiple sensors...
>
> Getting a bit picky aren't we?
>
> I'll settle for the 10 microns, back when I was a kid We used a
> yardstick...
>
might be nice.
I have resolution of .00005" (~ .00127mm, or 1.27 uM) on my CNC X and Y
axes right now, and it
is just about enough to get smooth circles interpolated. I DEFINITELY
would not want
to go any lower than that.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Paul Corner
2000-04-12 14:30:21 UTC
Yet more DRO
D.F.S.
2000-04-13 08:02:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet more DRO
Jon Elson
2000-04-13 12:14:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet more DRO
Paul Corner
2000-04-13 12:43:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet more DRO
Tim Barnard
2000-04-13 12:58:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet more DRO
D.F.S.
2000-04-13 13:01:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet more DRO
ptengin@a...
2000-04-13 13:48:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet more DRO
Paul Corner
2000-04-13 14:38:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet more DRO
Jon Elson
2000-04-13 15:55:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet more DRO