Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotary to linear translation - an interesting idea.
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-04-13 12:18:03 UTC
Ron Wickersham wrote:
bare emacs
tough to remember the thousands of commands, but XEMACS, with the
pull-down
menus is great! I'm definitely a convert!
Jon
> hi D.F.S,Oh OH! Religious war alert! I HATED vi when I had to use it. I found
>
> try pine, it's only one more keystroke than elm to start it up :-)
> and religious issues aside, it pretties up the infinite lines and
> correctly
> inserts greater-thans. i love it (and it also feeds standard editors,
>
> but none is finer than vi)
bare emacs
tough to remember the thousands of commands, but XEMACS, with the
pull-down
menus is great! I'm definitely a convert!
Jon
Discussion Thread
Bertho Boman
2000-04-12 13:44:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotary to linear translation - an interesting idea.
Jon Elson
2000-04-12 14:26:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotary to linear translation - an interesting idea.
D.F.S.
2000-04-12 14:55:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotary to linear translation - an interesting idea.
Jon Elson
2000-04-13 12:11:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotary to linear translation - an interesting idea.
Jon Elson
2000-04-13 12:18:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotary to linear translation - an interesting idea.
Terry May
2000-04-13 15:21:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotary to linear translation - an interesting idea.
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2000-04-13 15:53:47 UTC
Non-graphical operating systems
D.F.S.
2000-04-14 10:33:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotary to linear translation - an interesting idea.
Ian Wright
2000-04-15 00:51:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Rotary to linear translation - an interesting idea.