Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
Posted by
Tony Jeffree
on 2004-04-28 23:09:23 UTC
At 23:51 28/04/2004, peter_cassar wrote:
as effective as other forms of in-line coupling. Timing belt pulleys are
cost-effective too where it is desirable for the motor not to be in line
with the shaft, or where a reduction drive is needed.
Making your own Oldham couplings would be perfectly feasible, but not clear
that they are expensive enough to warrant the effort.
Regards,
Tony
>Does anyone have recommendations for flexible coupling arrangemetnsI have found the Oldham type of coupling to be generally cheaper and just
>between stepper and leadscrew shafts? Is there a process or design
>one can use to make their own? I'm thinking of the zero backlash type.
as effective as other forms of in-line coupling. Timing belt pulleys are
cost-effective too where it is desirable for the motor not to be in line
with the shaft, or where a reduction drive is needed.
Making your own Oldham couplings would be perfectly feasible, but not clear
that they are expensive enough to warrant the effort.
Regards,
Tony
Discussion Thread
peter_cassar
2004-04-28 19:14:25 UTC
Flexible Couplings
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2004-04-28 19:42:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
Larry Edinger
2004-04-28 19:45:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
Robert Campbell
2004-04-28 19:53:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
Harvey White
2004-04-28 19:56:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
JanRwl@A...
2004-04-28 20:39:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
peter_cassar
2004-04-28 22:55:43 UTC
Re: Flexible Couplings
peter_cassar
2004-04-28 22:56:17 UTC
Re: Flexible Couplings
Tony Jeffree
2004-04-28 23:09:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
Tony Jeffree
2004-04-28 23:13:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flexible Couplings
jess@p...
2004-04-29 01:53:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
josef wagner
2004-04-29 06:18:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
Armistead, Matthew D - Norman, OK - Cont
2004-04-29 07:36:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
Michael Johnston
2004-04-29 08:43:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flexible Couplings
Raymond Heckert
2004-04-29 19:18:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flexible Couplings
Tony Jeffree
2004-04-30 05:05:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flexible Couplings