Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flexible Couplings
Posted by
Tony Jeffree
on 2004-04-28 23:13:18 UTC
At 05:19 29/04/2004, you wrote:
Regards,
Tony
>Since I'm not using ballscrews there's already some backlash in theIf properly constructed, Oldham couplings can (should) have zero backlash.
>system so perhaps Oldham couplers would do after all the software has
>backlash compensation.
Regards,
Tony
Discussion Thread
peter_cassar
2004-04-28 19:14:25 UTC
Flexible Couplings
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2004-04-28 19:42:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
Larry Edinger
2004-04-28 19:45:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
Robert Campbell
2004-04-28 19:53:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
Harvey White
2004-04-28 19:56:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
JanRwl@A...
2004-04-28 20:39:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
peter_cassar
2004-04-28 22:55:43 UTC
Re: Flexible Couplings
peter_cassar
2004-04-28 22:56:17 UTC
Re: Flexible Couplings
Tony Jeffree
2004-04-28 23:09:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
Tony Jeffree
2004-04-28 23:13:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flexible Couplings
jess@p...
2004-04-29 01:53:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
josef wagner
2004-04-29 06:18:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
Armistead, Matthew D - Norman, OK - Cont
2004-04-29 07:36:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Couplings
Michael Johnston
2004-04-29 08:43:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flexible Couplings
Raymond Heckert
2004-04-29 19:18:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flexible Couplings
Tony Jeffree
2004-04-30 05:05:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Flexible Couplings