Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Names
Posted by
james owens
on 2000-05-04 16:14:48 UTC
Hi,
I know I shouldn't laugh but I find that two people, both intelligent, appear to have to defend their view to this degree. You both have a valid point.
Terry.
presentations, I was not pushing Vector at all (it was in the title, but not
the words). I merely showed when it is best to use CNC as opposed to manual
machining. Most of my discussion was about the $100,000 CNC lathe I watched
wreck itself & a statement to be safe when using CNC machines.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I know I shouldn't laugh but I find that two people, both intelligent, appear to have to defend their view to this degree. You both have a valid point.
Terry.
>Then we had Fred smith pushing CAD/CAM, and even making a foolish statementFor those of you who missed the little CNC discussion forum and
>that anyone making just one or two parts shouldnt be using CNC at all.
>He did get soundly shouted down on that statement!
presentations, I was not pushing Vector at all (it was in the title, but not
the words). I merely showed when it is best to use CNC as opposed to manual
machining. Most of my discussion was about the $100,000 CNC lathe I watched
wreck itself & a statement to be safe when using CNC machines.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
2000-05-04 12:13:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Names
Tim Goldstein
2000-05-04 12:23:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Names
Jon Anderson
2000-05-04 12:37:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Names
Dan Mauch
2000-05-04 12:53:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Names
Jon Elson
2000-05-04 13:25:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Names
james owens
2000-05-04 16:14:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Names
Jon Elson
2000-05-04 22:02:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Names