Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: part holding
Posted by
Ron K
on 2004-09-03 07:17:55 UTC
Keith Clark wrote:
flat surface to hold on to but you don't want to mill the sides of parts
because of cutting into the chuck .
parts are large enough . With vacuum chucks you can put a sacrificial
piece of sheet rubber in between the part and chuck so machining all
around the outside is not a problem
Ron Kline
American Precision Ceramics
>I just remembered a friend of the family who was an outstandingMagnetic chucks are great if the parts have SEVERAL square inches of
>machinist for General Motors in Michigan. He used a magnetic chuck
>in his garage shop.
>
flat surface to hold on to but you don't want to mill the sides of parts
because of cutting into the chuck .
> I also saw a used vacuum chuck at the localVacuum chucks also require a large contact area but work great if the
>machine tool store this week.
>
parts are large enough . With vacuum chucks you can put a sacrificial
piece of sheet rubber in between the part and chuck so machining all
around the outside is not a problem
> What about these two options? Is--
>this an old question or fruit for a good discussion?
>
>Keith Clark
>
>
Ron Kline
American Precision Ceramics
Discussion Thread
skykotech
2004-09-02 20:50:38 UTC
part holding
Tom Hubin
2004-09-02 21:07:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] part holding
skykotech
2004-09-02 21:38:25 UTC
Re: part holding
Keith Clark
2004-09-02 22:31:20 UTC
Re: part holding
Keith Clark
2004-09-02 22:36:15 UTC
Re: part holding
Doug Chartier
2004-09-03 00:25:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] part holding
Bill Vance
2004-09-03 00:34:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] part holding
Bob Muse
2004-09-03 01:33:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] part holding
Abby Katt
2004-09-03 02:30:31 UTC
Re: part holding
Bill Vance
2004-09-03 03:44:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] part holding
Ron K
2004-09-03 07:17:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: part holding
R Rogers
2004-09-03 07:20:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: part holding
terence figa
2004-09-03 08:07:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: part holding
R Rogers
2004-09-03 08:09:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] part holding
Bob Muse
2004-09-03 09:44:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] part holding
Jon Elson
2004-09-03 14:52:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: part holding
Marcus and Eva
2004-09-04 08:30:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] part holding
Doug Chartier
2004-09-04 10:05:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] part holding
Don Rogers
2004-09-04 22:37:01 UTC
Re: Re: part holding