Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed Loop PC Based CNC
Posted by
gary
on 2004-11-23 08:40:28 UTC
Les,
A great job of answering my questions!!
I will look deeper into this.
gary
Les Newell wrote:
A great job of answering my questions!!
I will look deeper into this.
gary
Les Newell wrote:
>Hi Gary,[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>I don't know the Rutex drives all that well but I will try to answer
>your questions.
>
> > 1) Does the drive have a PID Loop to control following error
> > calculated between comanded steps and encoder feedback?
>
>Yes
>
>
>> 2) Do the drives have both Proportional and Intergral Gain (linear
>>error and time base error multipliers)?
>>
>>
>
>You can control P,I and D. With the current version this is via 3 pots
>but on the latest version it is all done by software via the PC parallel
>port.
>
>
>
>> 3) Do the drives attempt to reduce any following error by iterating
>>to near zero or only monitor a "lost steps" count?
>>
>>
>>
>
>The I part of the loop will try to keep the error within 1 count. I used
>some Rutex step/dir to +/- 10V converters a while back and with no input
>steps they slowly cycled between two encoder counts (i.e. +/- 1 count).
>
>
>
>> 4) If the drive cannot keep up or exceeds the "lost steps" error
>>count does it shut down and drop a "drive ok" signal? Can this signal be
>>used to take the other drives off line by controlling the "drive enable"
>>signal to the other drives?
>>
>>
>>
>
>They have a fault output. I can't remember off-hand if that o/p can be
>used as an input as well. I tied all the following error outputs into my
>EStop chain.
>
>
>
>> 5) If the drives fault and go down, the control may not know and
>>keep chugging along like it had good sense. Is there an drive output to
>>the software to prevnt this?
>>
>>
>>
>
>I used the fault signal to EStop the machine. The computer soon knows
>about it then :-) The new version drives allow you to define the maximum
>following error before a fault. The older version is fixed to 1024 counts.
>
>
>
>>Some other desired features possible with a closed loop system are "soft
>>limits" and homing based on the encoder marker pulse. I would want to
>>drive the axis in the direction of the home limit at traverse speed
>>until the mechanical limit is tripped, switch to a slow approach speed
>>and drive until the marker pulse (Z/ZNOT) is detected.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Mach2 http://www.artofcnc.ca has soft limits. It also has quite a few
>other really useful features. It is a bit of a steep learning curve to
>start with but it is worth the effort. I don't think it currently
>supports a marker pulse reliably.
>
>
>
>>All in all however, I completely agree that this is a much better
>>approach than where we are now.
>>
>>
>
>I hate steppers. I have used quite a few stepper driven machines and
>they have all lost steps at some point. No matter how careful you are
>tuning them you will eventually find a job that has just the right
>combination of moves to make them lose steps.
>
>Les
>
>
>Addresses:
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
>Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
>URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
>OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
>If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
>http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
>NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
>bill
>List Mom
>List Owner
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
nitewatchman5
2004-11-23 06:07:15 UTC
Closed Loop PC Based CNC
Les Newell
2004-11-23 06:47:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed Loop PC Based CNC
gary
2004-11-23 07:53:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed Loop PC Based CNC
Les Newell
2004-11-23 08:20:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed Loop PC Based CNC
gary
2004-11-23 08:40:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed Loop PC Based CNC
Jon Elson
2004-11-23 10:06:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed Loop PC Based CNC
Paul
2004-11-23 10:52:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed Loop PC Based CNC
Mariss Freimanis
2004-11-23 17:36:18 UTC
Re: Closed Loop PC Based CNC
caudlet
2004-11-23 17:46:07 UTC
Re: Closed Loop PC Based CNC
Peter Renolds
2004-11-23 20:25:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed Loop PC Based CNC
Jon Elson
2004-11-23 20:47:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed Loop PC Based CNC
John Heritage
2004-11-24 01:04:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Closed Loop PC Based CNC
Pauls Mail
2004-11-24 07:05:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Closed Loop PC Based CNC
gary
2004-11-24 08:32:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Closed Loop PC Based CNC
Ron Kline
2004-11-24 09:42:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Closed Loop PC Based CNC
Jon Elson
2004-11-24 10:10:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Closed Loop PC Based CNC
Mariss Freimanis
2004-11-24 10:34:24 UTC
Re: Closed Loop PC Based CNC