CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko

on 2005-01-22 17:13:12 UTC
Not sure who your asking Wally but mine is belt drives with what I believe
is 2-1 ratio.

Have not decided on Geckos or? yet, still in the learning stages of this
project.

Scott L Golden
www.twwrc.homestead.com/current.html
Never Give Up



----- Original Message -----
From: "cnc_4_me" <cnc4me@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 8:56 AM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko


>
>
> Hi, I am also doing a bridgeport retrofit and am using
> steppers...Your post was very interisting, and i have a few questions
> about it...
>
> 1. Are your steppers directly driving the screw or are you using a 2
> to 1 belt reduction drive.
>
> 2. Are you using the Gecko G201 or the G210. And how are you
> driving the inputs to these drives. Full step, half step or micro
> step.
>
>
> Wally
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ja_erickson"
> <ja_erickson@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Evening All,
> >
> > I have been doing my Boss5 retrofit project for some time now and
> > have done exactly what you want to do with the exception of the
> power
> > supplies. i built my own 72 volt/7 amp toroidal power supplies and
> > used gecko g210's with pretty good results. I rewired the original
> > bridgeport steppers to run in "half winding" which will provided
> more
> > low speed torque. according to my bridgeport manuals the original
> > steppers were designed for 68 volts and 6.8 amps which is right on
> the
> > upper side for the geckos. I was concerned about it until i spoke
> to
> > the owner of gecko drives and he assured me that 72 volts and 7 amps
> > would be alright for the 201/210 series. he also warned that it
> would
> > be WISE to incorporate a "return energy dump circuit" in order
> > to protect the drive against any "returned energy" from the motors
> > during sudden stops.neither the drives or the motors ran hot so
> fans
> > for the drives were not needed.the campbell breakout board is a
> must
> > have item becuase it really provides alot of interfacing in a
> > relatively small footprint, well worth the cost. motor tuning with
> > mach2 went really smooth, just dont expect the machine to move like
> a
> > new c.n.c., the machine would lose steps if the accelerations were
> to
> > great and i think i could achieve 60-80 i.p.m. reliably.however
> there
> > was a problem with the system in the end where any feedrates below 4
> > i.p.m. were very steppy, by this i mean you could put your hand on
> > the table and actually feel the motors step. i couldnt have that
> > because i was afraid of tool marks on the workpiece. i talked with
> > the owner of gecko drives and he helped me all he could to rectify
> > that situation but we couldnt get rid of that steppiness. if that
> > situation doesnt bother you then i wouldnt hesitate to retro it.
> >
> > Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
[Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Discussion Thread

braidmeister 2005-01-20 09:26:35 UTC BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko turbulatordude 2005-01-20 10:40:51 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko R Rogers 2005-01-20 10:42:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko Tim Leech 2005-01-20 11:12:57 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko Les Newell 2005-01-20 11:57:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko braidmeister 2005-01-20 13:01:31 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko cnc_4_me 2005-01-20 14:00:56 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko braidmeister 2005-01-20 14:36:53 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko cnc_4_me 2005-01-20 14:45:21 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko dennis_meares 2005-01-20 15:31:40 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko bazer_20002000 2005-01-20 15:33:17 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko washcomp 2005-01-20 15:54:32 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko braidmeister 2005-01-21 06:15:35 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko John Rouche 2005-01-21 09:16:31 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko R Rogers 2005-01-21 11:51:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko John Rouche 2005-01-21 12:46:10 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko Les Newell 2005-01-21 13:56:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko ja_erickson 2005-01-21 17:51:59 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko braidmeister 2005-01-21 20:34:51 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko cnc_4_me 2005-01-22 05:56:23 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko Scott L Golden 2005-01-22 17:13:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko ja_erickson 2005-01-22 17:50:38 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko Luke1027 2005-01-22 18:52:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko John Rouche 2005-01-22 19:01:29 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko braidmeister 2005-01-22 19:29:30 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko ja_erickson 2005-01-23 07:23:10 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko braidmeister 2005-01-23 14:55:54 UTC Re: BOSS5 to Mach2/Gecko