CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Twin motor axis

Posted by cnc_4_me
on 2005-05-14 00:31:56 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
> IDA wrote:
>
> >Over on the Geckodrive group, a chap who seems to know what he is
talking about said it is a seriously bad idea to use two motors on a
single axis of a router or plasma table because of the risk of
serious damage to the machine if one motor fails when the other
continues. I am planning a large 2.5m x 3.5m router using 2 motors
on the x axis, and that post reawakened worries. The idea seems
fairly common, so what safeguards can be put in place to alleviate
this risk?
> >
> >
> All the large machines (gantry bed mills, vertical boring mills,
etc.)
> that use tandem axes have bearings on
> the beam that joins the gantry pillars. This allows the paired
slides
> to get out of sync with no harm to the
> machine. One bearing is a conventional bearing, the other is a
sliding
> fit, so it allows the beam to tilt without
> pulling the pillars together. (They probably have estop switches
to
> kill motion if it gets seriously out
> of sync.) This allows the two axis halves to move independently
toward
> the home location, and get sync'ed
> at home. Then, the CNC control is responsible for keeping them
synced.
>
> There are thousands of large machines in industry made this way.
>
> Jon


I think i need a pic to understand this. Do you have any link i
could use.


Wally

Discussion Thread

IDA 2005-05-13 09:13:02 UTC Twin motor axis Codesuidae 2005-05-13 09:32:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Twin motor axis Jon Elson 2005-05-13 09:54:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Twin motor axis R Rogers 2005-05-13 13:39:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Twin motor axis JanRwl@A... 2005-05-13 15:13:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Twin motor axis Robert Campbell 2005-05-13 19:05:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Twin motor axis cnc_4_me 2005-05-14 00:31:56 UTC Re: Twin motor axis