Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] quadrature endcoder woes?
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2005-10-14 21:15:31 UTC
Aaron wrote:
faster sweep rate, and you will likely see a more reasonable trace.
Jon
>I just installed a US Digital encoder (E4P-300-250-T) on a motor. ItYour scope is set for 1/10th of a second per division. Set it for a much
>was a royal pain as the centering tool was pretty tight on the motor
>shaft and then the centering tool was quite tight on the PCB when I
>pressed it into place.
>
>With my motor running at a constant 1 rpm, I get the following scope trace:
>http://www.bright.net/~agarb/quad.jpg
>
>
faster sweep rate, and you will likely see a more reasonable trace.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Aaron
2005-10-14 19:20:29 UTC
quadrature endcoder woes?
Jack Hudler
2005-10-14 20:00:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] quadrature endcoder woes?
Jon Elson
2005-10-14 21:15:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] quadrature endcoder woes?
juan gelt
2005-10-15 01:06:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] quadrature endcoder woes?
Mariss Freimanis
2005-10-15 13:20:15 UTC
Re: quadrature endcoder woes?
eewizard_1
2005-10-15 20:49:31 UTC
Re: quadrature endcoder woes?
Jack Hudler
2005-10-17 10:51:00 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] quadrature endcoder woes?
Aaron
2005-10-18 03:29:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: quadrature endcoder woes?
eewizard_1
2005-10-18 21:42:44 UTC
Re: quadrature endcoder woes?