CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Tubing Notcher

on 2005-11-07 07:38:22 UTC
<snip>

> I should appreciate people's ideas for the architecture and how I
> should best implement the hardware for the combination of
> movements. Also, ideas for how the workpiece (tube) should be held
> would be of interest.
>

<snip>


If you have a maximum working OD, then the machine spindle would need
to be able to offer clearance for that.

I needed to do some work on some rounds and looked at an R8 collet
spinner. (less than $50.00 USD) and mounting a timing gear on the
thing.

If this is a one off, you might want to just buy the very large
bearings. If you are just trying things out, considder using 3
bearings like a lathe steady rest. two sets, a few inches apart would
offer a stable alignment.

You commented on the Z axis (along the axis) as being mounted and the
rotary axis and the depth of cut axis getting out of tolearance.

My I respectifully comment that the plasma cutting will be grossly out
of tolearance compared to any mechanical bits you are using ?

A torch height control is probably no needed as your parts will be
held in tolerance to much higher tolerances than a sheet on a table.
And since the joints will be welded, that too would mean sloppy fits
would be acceptabe, no ?

that said, setting the height with feeler gauges would suffice, or
just a bump and back-off hand dial.

Piercing would be another matter. That may need either manual
intervention or be automated.


Dave

Discussion Thread

douglasr987 2005-11-06 07:34:24 UTC Tubing Notcher gary 2005-11-06 13:31:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Tubing Notcher douglasr987 2005-11-07 01:48:32 UTC Re: Tubing Notcher turbulatordude 2005-11-07 07:38:22 UTC Re: Tubing Notcher gary 2005-11-07 18:55:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tubing Notcher douglasr987 2005-11-08 08:24:18 UTC Re: Tubing Notcher gary 2005-11-08 22:19:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tubing Notcher