Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Software options
Posted by
Lester Caine
on 2006-06-26 07:37:06 UTC
Peter Reilley wrote:
removing multiple construction lines, breaking construction lines,
putting in stepped dimensions, and all the other 'nice things' you can
do with paper and pencil. I converted my own draftsman to CAD many years
ago - when machines were more prone to crashing - and after one such
crash he commented "It's just like a drawing board, one sneezes and all
the lines drop on the floor" :) Now he is creating advanced aerospace
models and the documentation accuracy has to be to a very high standard.
Something that required an office with several draftsmen in the past,
but which now he produces with a few clicks ;)
is SET to metric, one ends up with a scaling of all the dimension text
by 25.4 :( But a quick rescale when that happens and the dimension text
is back to what it should be. So changes in size scale all of the
dimensions. Trying to do some of that in Dolphin has been giving me what
I would describe as rounding errors, where 'round numbers' develop a
fractional part. Basically dimensions SHOULD scale with changes to the
base lines, but some packages do not 'link' the text, and just create
fixed text dimensions which then need to be edited if the base drawing
changes.
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk
Model Engineers Digital Workshop -
http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/
Treasurer - Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
>>I understand that TurboCad has a similar limitation on moving dimensionSimple moving of the dimension is not the problem, it's to do with
>>lines around to make a drawing readable.
>>But I stand to be corrected on that.
>
> In TurboCAD you can move the dimensions far away from
> the measurement point as you want. That way you can
> avoid having them pile up on each other. Is that what
> you were concerned about. It is quite amazing how
> you can flip the dimension around to find a suitable
> placement.
removing multiple construction lines, breaking construction lines,
putting in stepped dimensions, and all the other 'nice things' you can
do with paper and pencil. I converted my own draftsman to CAD many years
ago - when machines were more prone to crashing - and after one such
crash he commented "It's just like a drawing board, one sneezes and all
the lines drop on the floor" :) Now he is creating advanced aerospace
models and the documentation accuracy has to be to a very high standard.
Something that required an office with several draftsmen in the past,
but which now he produces with a few clicks ;)
> One objection that I have is that if you dimension somethingOne niggle with Pro-engineer to Autocad porting is that while everything
> and then you later change that something the dimension
> does not reflect the change. Is that the normal way this is
> done. I am a CAD newbee so I don't know how other
> CAD packages do it.
is SET to metric, one ends up with a scaling of all the dimension text
by 25.4 :( But a quick rescale when that happens and the dimension text
is back to what it should be. So changes in size scale all of the
dimensions. Trying to do some of that in Dolphin has been giving me what
I would describe as rounding errors, where 'round numbers' develop a
fractional part. Basically dimensions SHOULD scale with changes to the
base lines, but some packages do not 'link' the text, and just create
fixed text dimensions which then need to be edited if the base drawing
changes.
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk
Model Engineers Digital Workshop -
http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/
Treasurer - Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
Discussion Thread
Lester Caine
2006-06-25 01:12:37 UTC
Software options
wthomas@g...
2006-06-25 05:14:57 UTC
W.E.T. [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Software options
turbulatordude
2006-06-25 05:46:01 UTC
Re: Software options
Harko Schwartz
2006-06-25 06:25:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Software options
Philip Burman
2006-06-25 08:15:39 UTC
Re: Software options
Lester Caine
2006-06-25 11:29:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Software options
Lester Caine
2006-06-25 11:31:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Software options
Stephen Wille Padnos
2006-06-25 11:37:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Software options
Ken Ferrell
2006-06-25 14:48:59 UTC
Re: Software options
Philip Burman
2006-06-25 17:38:10 UTC
Re: Software options
Lester Caine
2006-06-25 23:46:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Software options
Lester Caine
2006-06-26 01:16:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Software options
William Perun Sr
2006-06-26 06:35:34 UTC
Re: Software options
Peter Reilley
2006-06-26 07:07:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Software options
Lester Caine
2006-06-26 07:14:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Software options
Lester Caine
2006-06-26 07:37:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Software options
Philip Burman
2006-06-26 11:06:44 UTC
Re: Software options
zephyr9900@c...
2006-06-26 11:10:13 UTC
Re: Software options
Peter Linss
2006-06-28 01:04:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Software options
Lester Caine
2006-06-28 02:18:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Software options
Peter Linss
2006-06-28 20:17:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Software options