Re: Fab@Home
Posted by
Dennis Schmitz
on 2007-01-09 17:11:37 UTC
It actually reminds me of RepRap, only loaded with intellectual property
restrictions.
restrictions.
On 1/9/07, Dennis Schmitz <denschmitz@...> wrote:
>
> I haven't been following the list in a while, so this may be redundant --
> if so, apologies for wasting time.
>
> A new device showed up in the newsfeed today, a $2400 rapid prototyping
> kit:
>
>
> http://www.newscientisttech.com/article/dn10922-desktop-fabricator-may-kickstart-home-revolution.html
>
> Despite looking kinda flimsy, I still want one.
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Dennis Schmitz
2007-01-09 17:01:00 UTC
Fab@Home
Dennis Schmitz
2007-01-09 17:11:37 UTC
Re: Fab@Home
Graham Stabler
2007-01-09 18:13:56 UTC
Re: Fab@Home
Sebastien Bailard
2007-01-10 00:19:18 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Fab@Home
Phil Mattison
2007-01-10 08:38:10 UTC
Re: Fab@Home
Sebastien Bailard
2007-01-10 10:52:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Fab@Home
Dennis Schmitz
2007-01-10 14:45:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Fab@Home
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2007-01-10 18:43:35 UTC
RepRap (was RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Fab@Home)
Sebastien Bailard
2007-01-10 19:16:40 UTC
Re: RepRap (was RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Fab@Home)
Jon Elson
2007-01-10 19:51:11 UTC
Re: RepRap (was RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Fab@Home)
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2007-01-11 05:44:57 UTC
RE: RepRap (was RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Fab@Home)