Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Posted by
Dennis Schmitz
on 2007-01-12 01:29:09 UTC
Well, not today anyway, but I'll see it in my lifetime -- technology is
still advancing on an exponential.
I expect these guys will be the first to succeed, though (no disrespect to
RepRep et. al.):
http://syntheticbiology.org/
still advancing on an exponential.
I expect these guys will be the first to succeed, though (no disrespect to
RepRep et. al.):
http://syntheticbiology.org/
On 1/11/07, Phil Mattison <mattison20@...> wrote:
>
>
> I agree with you. No machine can really replicate itself, not even a
> Bridgeport.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Phil Mattison
2007-01-11 07:23:21 UTC
Re: RepRap
Charles Anderson
2007-01-11 14:59:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Dennis Schmitz
2007-01-12 01:29:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Dennis Schmitz
2007-01-12 01:30:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Tony Smith
2007-01-12 12:20:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Charles Anderson
2007-01-12 14:17:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Jon Elson
2007-01-12 18:44:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Charles Anderson
2007-01-12 19:10:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Peter Reilley
2007-01-12 20:25:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Sebastien Bailard
2007-01-12 20:53:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Jon Elson
2007-01-12 21:14:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Jon Elson
2007-01-12 21:21:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap