Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2007-01-12 21:21:17 UTC
Peter Reilley wrote:
up at their St. Charles, MO location, as the shipping on these things will
run more than the plate itself. (They were a bit dubious about forklifting
a 350 Lb surface plate into a Toyota station wagon, but it did fine!)
It doesn't really make sense to make one of these, unless you have a
masochistic streak. I hand-scraped several precision tools on it, and
kept my straightedge true while doing my 6' lathe bed. Then, to
make some other tools, like squares for aligning a mill's axes, I needed
a precision hand-scraped square. A few came across eBay at high prices,
and I didn't manage to snag any of them. I finally got a rough casting
for one on eBay. It was listed as "precision hand scraped". Well, I took
that with a big grain of salt, and it turned out it had been "broken up",
meaning the hard skin of the casting had been hacked off with a chisel.
That was fine, I wanted to scrape it in myself, so I could KNOW it was
true. I bought a cheap 8 x 8 x 8 ground angle plate on sale and cut it
in half, making two 8 x 8 x 4" angle pieces with one rib each. I hand
scraped in one surface of each of these 3 pieces on the surface plate.
I labeled them A, B and C. I then put two at a time on the surface plate
in the order A-B, then B-C, then C-A and spotted and scraped the 2nd
face of the 2nd piece of the pair. When done, I had 3 plates that all
verified flat against the surface plate, and by definition had to all be
a true 90 degree angle. This process works the same as the automatic
generation of a flat, if you already have a flat surface to place both
squares on.
Jon
>In "Foundations of Mechanical Accuracy" they describeI bought a decent surface plate on sale from KBC, and went to pick it
>how to make a surface plate with no reference surface.
>It involves grinding three square or round plates together
>in a certain order. If done properly the three plates
>will grind each other flatter and flatter. There is no
>theoretical limit to this process. You can go to optical
>flatness and further. All done without precision machinery
>or measurement tools.
>
>
up at their St. Charles, MO location, as the shipping on these things will
run more than the plate itself. (They were a bit dubious about forklifting
a 350 Lb surface plate into a Toyota station wagon, but it did fine!)
It doesn't really make sense to make one of these, unless you have a
masochistic streak. I hand-scraped several precision tools on it, and
kept my straightedge true while doing my 6' lathe bed. Then, to
make some other tools, like squares for aligning a mill's axes, I needed
a precision hand-scraped square. A few came across eBay at high prices,
and I didn't manage to snag any of them. I finally got a rough casting
for one on eBay. It was listed as "precision hand scraped". Well, I took
that with a big grain of salt, and it turned out it had been "broken up",
meaning the hard skin of the casting had been hacked off with a chisel.
That was fine, I wanted to scrape it in myself, so I could KNOW it was
true. I bought a cheap 8 x 8 x 8 ground angle plate on sale and cut it
in half, making two 8 x 8 x 4" angle pieces with one rib each. I hand
scraped in one surface of each of these 3 pieces on the surface plate.
I labeled them A, B and C. I then put two at a time on the surface plate
in the order A-B, then B-C, then C-A and spotted and scraped the 2nd
face of the 2nd piece of the pair. When done, I had 3 plates that all
verified flat against the surface plate, and by definition had to all be
a true 90 degree angle. This process works the same as the automatic
generation of a flat, if you already have a flat surface to place both
squares on.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Phil Mattison
2007-01-11 07:23:21 UTC
Re: RepRap
Charles Anderson
2007-01-11 14:59:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Dennis Schmitz
2007-01-12 01:29:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Dennis Schmitz
2007-01-12 01:30:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Tony Smith
2007-01-12 12:20:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Charles Anderson
2007-01-12 14:17:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Jon Elson
2007-01-12 18:44:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Charles Anderson
2007-01-12 19:10:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Peter Reilley
2007-01-12 20:25:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Sebastien Bailard
2007-01-12 20:53:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Jon Elson
2007-01-12 21:14:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap
Jon Elson
2007-01-12 21:21:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: RepRap