Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
Posted by
markotime
on 2007-03-24 04:46:50 UTC
Your comments on BobCAD are certainly supported by
many messages here. And while that product and Vector did have
common roots, I doubt that many today would put them into
the same bucket of bilge - except, perhaps, for ... Oops,
we're getting into territory which could get us banned
from the group.... / mark
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Rodney Hill
<thecadcamconsultants@...> wrote:
customers repeated to me day after day year after year. You dont
understand how many refunds came in and BobCAD denys them. Trust me,
try calling bobcad once. The sales guys know nothing about the
software, all they know is how to sell.
many messages here. And while that product and Vector did have
common roots, I doubt that many today would put them into
the same bucket of bilge - except, perhaps, for ... Oops,
we're getting into territory which could get us banned
from the group.... / mark
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Rodney Hill
<thecadcamconsultants@...> wrote:
>company and software inside out. Im relaying the message that BobCAD
> FYI Mark on time, I worked at BobCAD for several years, I know the
customers repeated to me day after day year after year. You dont
understand how many refunds came in and BobCAD denys them. Trust me,
try calling bobcad once. The sales guys know nothing about the
software, all they know is how to sell.
>the judgemental prigs who trash competitors to
> markotime <markotime@...> wrote: I'm REALLY suspicious of
> the product in which they have some proprietary interest or emotional
> stake. Download the demos and make up your own mind, ignore the
> quasi-religious zealots. /mark in BC (who happens to use Vector,
> thank you very much.)
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Rodney Hill
> <thecadcamconsultants@> wrote:
> >
> > Dolphin CAD/CAM is much better than both. BobCAD and Vector owners
> are brothers anyways. Try Dolphin, same price.
> >
> > www.cadcamconsultants.net
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Discussion Thread
armand_th
2007-03-11 07:47:30 UTC
BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
Rodney Hill
2007-03-20 02:30:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
R Rogers
2007-03-20 06:41:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
robpiaz
2007-03-20 20:19:30 UTC
Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
Jon Elson
2007-03-20 22:25:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
markotime
2007-03-21 04:46:09 UTC
Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
Rodney Hill
2007-03-23 17:40:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
markotime
2007-03-24 04:46:50 UTC
Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
R Rogers
2007-03-24 06:14:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
Fred Smith
2007-03-24 07:44:09 UTC
Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
ballendo
2007-03-24 12:30:23 UTC
Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
R Rogers
2007-03-24 14:05:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
Rodney Hill
2007-03-24 16:54:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
R Rogers
2007-03-24 18:50:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
ballendo
2007-03-24 18:59:16 UTC
Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
Rodney Hill
2007-03-25 04:40:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam