CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam

Posted by R Rogers
on 2007-03-24 06:14:08 UTC
Bobcad Version 19 and back were buggy (they don't sell them anymore). Version 20 and up are very stable. I and others I know use it practically every day and have no complaints. The claim that you call and get a "salesman" for support is innaccurate. They have a support department and they have been helpful when contacted.

Practically everyone in this trade I've showed it to has bought it. Not one of them has regretted it or asked for a refund.

Simply coming out and saying it's no good because they are brothers or some such nonsense, is just that. If one thinks it's no good, how about some examples or details and basis for the claim? And then following up with "you should buy ours instead" again, how about some examples and basis for that claim?

Ron

markotime <markotime@...> wrote:
Your comments on BobCAD are certainly supported by
many messages here. And while that product and Vector did have
common roots, I doubt that many today would put them into
the same bucket of bilge - except, perhaps, for ... Oops,
we're getting into territory which could get us banned
from the group.... / mark

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Rodney Hill
<thecadcamconsultants@...> wrote:
>
> FYI Mark on time, I worked at BobCAD for several years, I know the
company and software inside out. Im relaying the message that BobCAD
customers repeated to me day after day year after year. You dont
understand how many refunds came in and BobCAD denys them. Trust me,
try calling bobcad once. The sales guys know nothing about the
software, all they know is how to sell.
>
> markotime <markotime@...> wrote: I'm REALLY suspicious of
the judgemental prigs who trash competitors to
> the product in which they have some proprietary interest or emotional
> stake. Download the demos and make up your own mind, ignore the
> quasi-religious zealots. /mark in BC (who happens to use Vector,
> thank you very much.)
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Rodney Hill
> <thecadcamconsultants@> wrote:
> >
> > Dolphin CAD/CAM is much better than both. BobCAD and Vector owners
> are brothers anyways. Try Dolphin, same price.
> >
> > www.cadcamconsultants.net
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Discussion Thread

armand_th 2007-03-11 07:47:30 UTC BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam Rodney Hill 2007-03-20 02:30:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam R Rogers 2007-03-20 06:41:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam robpiaz 2007-03-20 20:19:30 UTC Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam Jon Elson 2007-03-20 22:25:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam markotime 2007-03-21 04:46:09 UTC Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam Rodney Hill 2007-03-23 17:40:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam markotime 2007-03-24 04:46:50 UTC Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam R Rogers 2007-03-24 06:14:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam Fred Smith 2007-03-24 07:44:09 UTC Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam ballendo 2007-03-24 12:30:23 UTC Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam R Rogers 2007-03-24 14:05:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam Rodney Hill 2007-03-24 16:54:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam R Rogers 2007-03-24 18:50:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam ballendo 2007-03-24 18:59:16 UTC Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam Rodney Hill 2007-03-25 04:40:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam