Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: IMService releases ncPOD system
Posted by
Stephen Wille Padnos
on 2007-05-24 10:27:07 UTC
Alan KM6VV wrote:
code instead of the GPL licensed code.
related to the ncPod. :)
The EMC1 codebase hasn't had any changes for around 16 months, and that
particular change was the removal of some code for the final release.
The interpreter in EMC2 is based on the original NIST work, so I'd like
to know of any problems there as well - it's possible that some of the
problems are lurking in the EMC2 code.
>All,I suspect the reason would be so that he could use the Public Domain
>
>I believe Bert (USBCNC) told me that he intentionally used a relatively old
>version of the EMC files to spawn his product for reasons that escape me
>now.
>
>
code instead of the GPL licensed code.
>What are the issues in Bert's programs?ah - I had missed that this is actually a separate product, in no way
>
>
related to the ncPod. :)
The EMC1 codebase hasn't had any changes for around 16 months, and that
particular change was the removal of some code for the final release.
The interpreter in EMC2 is based on the original NIST work, so I'd like
to know of any problems there as well - it's possible that some of the
problems are lurking in the EMC2 code.
>Alan KM6VV- Steve
>
>
Discussion Thread
John Stevenson
2007-05-23 14:36:32 UTC
Re: Re: Re: IMService releases ncPOD system
ballendo
2007-05-24 03:48:14 UTC
Re: IMService releases ncPOD system
Stephen Wille Padnos
2007-05-24 07:43:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: IMService releases ncPOD system
Alan KM6VV
2007-05-24 09:48:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: IMService releases ncPOD system
Stephen Wille Padnos
2007-05-24 10:27:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: IMService releases ncPOD system
Alan KM6VV
2007-05-24 12:37:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: IMService releases ncPOD system