Re: Mach3
Posted by
Preston Petty
on 2007-09-17 17:03:22 UTC
Would not an ethernet card connecting two machines (DOS & XP) together
accomplish about the same thing?
That way you could have one "dedicated pc" for cnc control stability.
Pres
----
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "John Hansford" <kz1927@...>
wrote:
accomplish about the same thing?
That way you could have one "dedicated pc" for cnc control stability.
Pres
----
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "John Hansford" <kz1927@...>
wrote:
>the
> Mach3 has unbelievable stuff now. Check the Yahoo
> group. It now has "brains".
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mach1mach2cnc/
>
> On great advantage is not having to boot into DOS
> to run a file. You can be working on a design, minimize
> you design program and test run in Mach3. Back & forth
> in seconds instead of minutes.
>
> I've even run it while connected to the net....not as
> a matter of doing actual work, but it didn't miss
> a beat for that test.
>
> John
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "the_real_bogie"
> <take_action@> wrote:
> >
> > I'm currently using TurboCNC, but was thinking about trying Mach3.
> >
> > Can anyone compare the features of these two programs? Assuming
> > purchase price is not an issure.
> >
> > Also, does anyone know if Mach3 has a tool "offset" feature, which
> > TurboCNC does not have.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>
Discussion Thread
the_real_bogie
2007-09-17 14:30:26 UTC
Mach3
John Hansford
2007-09-17 16:42:10 UTC
Re: Mach3
Preston Petty
2007-09-17 17:03:22 UTC
Re: Mach3
John Hansford
2007-09-17 17:46:47 UTC
Re: Mach3
Henrik Olsson
2007-09-18 08:15:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mach3
David G. LeVine
2007-09-19 10:53:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Mach3
Brian Foley
2007-09-20 19:34:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Mach3