Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Mach3
Posted by
David G. LeVine
on 2007-09-19 10:53:00 UTC
At 08:01 PM 9/17/2007, you wrote:
something on and it might cause interrupts at "bad" times causing
stutter or missed steps.
Linux with RTAI (the real time application interface) might be a better choice.
But by all means try the DOS setup if you have networking software
for it. Novell and Lantastic worked pretty well as did Micro$oft
Workgroups for Windows, but I never checked the interrupt latency issues.
David G. LeVine
Nashua, NH 03060
>Would not an ethernet card connecting two machines (DOS & XP) togetherDOS does not have networking built in. You would need to add
>accomplish about the same thing?
something on and it might cause interrupts at "bad" times causing
stutter or missed steps.
Linux with RTAI (the real time application interface) might be a better choice.
But by all means try the DOS setup if you have networking software
for it. Novell and Lantastic worked pretty well as did Micro$oft
Workgroups for Windows, but I never checked the interrupt latency issues.
David G. LeVine
Nashua, NH 03060
Discussion Thread
the_real_bogie
2007-09-17 14:30:26 UTC
Mach3
John Hansford
2007-09-17 16:42:10 UTC
Re: Mach3
Preston Petty
2007-09-17 17:03:22 UTC
Re: Mach3
John Hansford
2007-09-17 17:46:47 UTC
Re: Mach3
Henrik Olsson
2007-09-18 08:15:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mach3
David G. LeVine
2007-09-19 10:53:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Mach3
Brian Foley
2007-09-20 19:34:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Mach3