Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LinuxCNC laptops
Posted by
Stephen Wille Padnos
on 2008-03-03 22:21:11 UTC
Tom Hubin wrote:
Incidentally, I don't think the 64-second period is a spec anywhere, I'm
betting it's the overflow of a 16-bit counter counting 1000 Hz or 1024
Hz timer ticks or something like that.
- Steve
>Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:It also applies to desktops. It just seems to be ubiquitous on laptops.
>
>
>>So here's the problem: every 64 seconds, and whenever a "system
>>management event" occurs, the processor will stop whatever it's doing,
>>and go off to take care of "system-y things". This can take several
>>hundred milliseconds to complete.
>>
>>
>
>Hello Stephen,
>
>Does this apply only to laptops or are desktops also susceptible to this
> interrupt every 64 seconds?
>
>
Incidentally, I don't think the 64-second period is a spec anywhere, I'm
betting it's the overflow of a 16-bit counter counting 1000 Hz or 1024
Hz timer ticks or something like that.
- Steve
Discussion Thread
marcin_ose
2008-03-03 18:43:08 UTC
LinuxCNC laptops
stan
2008-03-03 18:49:13 UTC
Ref: LinuxCNC laptops
Stephen Wille Padnos
2008-03-03 19:17:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LinuxCNC laptops
Tom Hubin
2008-03-03 22:16:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LinuxCNC laptops
Michael Fagan
2008-03-03 22:19:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LinuxCNC laptops
Stephen Wille Padnos
2008-03-03 22:21:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LinuxCNC laptops
Stephen Wille Padnos
2008-03-03 22:26:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LinuxCNC laptops
Michael Fagan
2008-03-03 22:32:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] LinuxCNC laptops
Yahoo
2008-03-04 07:48:56 UTC
Re: LinuxCNC laptops
caudlet
2008-03-04 07:50:57 UTC
Re: LinuxCNC laptops
Dave Halliday
2008-03-04 23:42:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LinuxCNC laptops
gcode fi (hanermo)
2008-03-05 01:33:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: LinuxCNC laptops - OT Compaq
stan
2008-03-05 02:08:26 UTC
Ref: LinuxCNC laptops - OT Compaq
Michael Fagan
2008-03-05 21:38:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Ref: LinuxCNC laptops - OT Compaq