Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: MachMotion vs. DIY for a Bridgeport
Posted by
Jim Fleig - CNC Services
on 2009-02-23 00:12:29 UTC
FWIW
I have seen Bridgeport Boss style knee mills with Interact controls. Not very many but they are out there.
Jim
I have seen Bridgeport Boss style knee mills with Interact controls. Not very many but they are out there.
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Fagan
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 9:45 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: MachMotion vs. DIY for a Bridgeport
FYI-A Bridgeport Interact is a Hardinge product, it's an enclosed CNC
mill (10kw spindle, 40 taper, etc). It's not a Bridgeport manual mill
conversion.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Danny Miller <dannym@...> wrote:
> OK, I kept thinking that that number wasn't right.
> Haven't seen a Bridgeport either.
>
> So listen to Henrik here.
>
> Danny
>
> Henrik Olsson wrote:
>> Hi Danny,
>> I think you've got that a bit wrong.... The G540 does not contain 4
>> G203's.
>> It contains 4 G250's which are rated at 60% of the voltage and half the
>> current compared to a G203 (50V/3.5A vs 80V/7A), that makes quite a bit of
>> difference when talking about Bridgeport sized machines.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure that a G540 and the 200oz-in NEMA23 motors you referred to
>> are too small for a Bridgeport without going to ridiculous reduction
>> rations
>> between the motor and screw. Most Bridgeport conversions I've seen runs on
>> 600-1200oz-in step motors.
>>
>> /Henrik.
>>
>>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
danieltmedlin
2009-02-17 15:52:28 UTC
MachMotion vs. DIY for a Bridgeport
Danny Miller
2009-02-17 22:32:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] MachMotion vs. DIY for a Bridgeport
Marv Frankel
2009-02-18 05:41:43 UTC
Re: MachMotion vs. DIY for a Bridgeport
Danny Miller
2009-02-18 10:52:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: MachMotion vs. DIY for a Bridgeport
Jim Fleig - CNC Services
2009-02-18 11:54:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] MachMotion vs. DIY for a Bridgeport
Henrik Olsson
2009-02-18 12:50:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: MachMotion vs. DIY for a Bridgeport
Andrew Werby
2009-02-18 13:06:36 UTC
Re: Re: MachMotion vs. DIY for a Bridgeport
Danny Miller
2009-02-18 17:31:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: MachMotion vs. DIY for a Bridgeport
Michael Fagan
2009-02-18 18:45:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: MachMotion vs. DIY for a Bridgeport
Jim Fleig - CNC Services
2009-02-23 00:12:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: MachMotion vs. DIY for a Bridgeport