Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2009-03-07 10:11:50 UTC
Doug Pollard wrote:
controls, no electronics at all.
The joke was they'd still work after the Russians nuked the place and
all the electronics quit.
I'm surprised it wouldn't hold .003" tolerances, but it did have
PNEUMATIC linear encoders, with plates with holes in them.
As the plates slid past each other, different holes lined up, encoding
the position. I don't know what the basic resolution of those encoders
were, though. I'd guess they might be a bit coarse by today's standards.
Jon
>>Yes, those were certainly a mechanical nightmare, all pneumatic
> Jon, Speaking of the MOOG nc mill They brought me one on demo to do a
> job which had a lot of dememtions tolerenced to .oo3 center to center.
> This I think was the first year they were in production maybe 1966.
> The machine could not hold the tolerence. They may have gotten better
> in later models. I would think you are right though it would seem to me
> an excellent machine to convert as it was a quality machine and would be
> a quick and easy conversion. I would think it would be hard to find
> one that has not been converted though Doug
>
controls, no electronics at all.
The joke was they'd still work after the Russians nuked the place and
all the electronics quit.
I'm surprised it wouldn't hold .003" tolerances, but it did have
PNEUMATIC linear encoders, with plates with holes in them.
As the plates slid past each other, different holes lined up, encoding
the position. I don't know what the basic resolution of those encoders
were, though. I'd guess they might be a bit coarse by today's standards.
Jon
Discussion Thread
hanson_whitey
2009-03-04 13:41:23 UTC
To the moderator
Andy Wander
2009-03-04 16:19:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
Wreno Wynne
2009-03-05 04:46:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
Marv Frankel
2009-03-05 06:47:14 UTC
Re: To the moderator
whitey
2009-03-05 06:59:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
Jon Elson
2009-03-05 10:16:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
whitey
2009-03-05 11:33:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
Jon Elson
2009-03-05 20:34:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
whitey
2009-03-05 23:06:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
Doug Pollard
2009-03-06 06:33:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
whitey
2009-03-06 16:42:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
Jon Elson
2009-03-06 19:29:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
whitey
2009-03-06 20:37:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
Doug Pollard
2009-03-07 07:33:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
Jon Elson
2009-03-07 10:11:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator
wanliker@a...
2009-03-07 14:39:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] To the moderator