Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: reprat build started
Posted by
Mike Payson
on 2011-10-20 20:26:03 UTC
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Dan Field <danfield@...> wrote:
print. Not sure what it is, but I doubt that the plastic will properly
bond at 2M/sec.
There isn't a minimum speed per se, but for some things, such as
bridging voids, printing faster yields noticeably better results. I
would say the minimum speed for good results is somewhere around
30-35mm/sec, and depending on your printer you can get good results up
to 200+mm/sec, possibly much faster.
The reason to go fast for hobby stuff is sanity. ;-) Imagine you were
milling a large void in an object, but you could only do it at .35mm
DOC and .5mm width... You can imagine that it would be a pretty
frustrating experience, even with CNC. Printing is the same way. You
don't have to print faster, but it certainly makes the process more
fun.
> Well, if speed is the issue how about Servo Belts? 2 meters/sec !Speed is good, but there is a practical limit to how fast we can
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdJoVh6DRPA&NR=1
>
> Then of course speed is nice but if you are just making something for
> yourself as a hobby is there a problem doing it slowly? Is there some
> minimum magic number the melted product needs to be put down at to stick
> properly or is it just the need for speed?
print. Not sure what it is, but I doubt that the plastic will properly
bond at 2M/sec.
There isn't a minimum speed per se, but for some things, such as
bridging voids, printing faster yields noticeably better results. I
would say the minimum speed for good results is somewhere around
30-35mm/sec, and depending on your printer you can get good results up
to 200+mm/sec, possibly much faster.
The reason to go fast for hobby stuff is sanity. ;-) Imagine you were
milling a large void in an object, but you could only do it at .35mm
DOC and .5mm width... You can imagine that it would be a pretty
frustrating experience, even with CNC. Printing is the same way. You
don't have to print faster, but it certainly makes the process more
fun.
Discussion Thread
Alan
2011-10-12 11:00:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: reprat build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-12 11:12:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: reprat build started
Ron Thompson
2011-10-12 11:53:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: reprat build started
Alan
2011-10-12 13:31:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: reprat build started
Dan Field
2011-10-20 18:14:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: reprat build started
Mike Payson
2011-10-20 20:26:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: reprat build started