Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Toroidal Bore, Revisited
Posted by
dave engvall
on 2000-09-07 09:38:20 UTC
Carlos Guillermo wrote:
> Almost sounds like an aerospace/medical/government project where $$ is notDave
> an issue, and the designers often get used to not having to worry about how
> the part gets made.
>
> Any reason the part couldn't be split into two halves? What's the part for,
> anyway?
>
> Lots of luck,
> Carlos
>
> Looking at the dwg I don't think there is enough material on the outside to hold two halves together. I would guess it is an
> aircraft part. If my memory serves correctly it was 6061 which for me machines like toothpaste. I happen to like 7075 better and
> if cost is not an issue???
Discussion Thread
Joe Vicars
2000-09-07 06:54:47 UTC
Toroidal Bore, Revisited
Carlos Guillermo
2000-09-07 08:04:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Toroidal Bore, Revisited
dave engvall
2000-09-07 09:38:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Toroidal Bore, Revisited
Ian Wright
2000-09-07 11:49:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Toroidal Bore, Revisited