Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Slightly off-topic : History behind lettered drills
Posted by
Darrell
on 2000-10-03 20:06:09 UTC
The big problem with not being on the metric system here was
stupid government. They tried to change to metric while
retaining the inch measurement. That made all of the metric
measurements some decimal fraction. Where they did change to
metric measurement, it took and works. Just look at the two
liter pop containers.
Darrell
stupid government. They tried to change to metric while
retaining the inch measurement. That made all of the metric
measurements some decimal fraction. Where they did change to
metric measurement, it took and works. Just look at the two
liter pop containers.
Darrell
----- Original Message -----
From: "dave engvall" <dengvall@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Slightly off-topic : History
behind lettered drills
> > hence our manufacturing proceeds with imperial.
> > Measurement is an exact science but boring !
> > Steve Roberts
> > Professional Engineer (Canada & UK)
> >
>
> Mixed measurement systems are a problem.
> IMHO if we had put Km on our interstate hwy system and
sold gasoline in liters we would be metric now.
> Most of the international manufacturing concerns (car
companies) have gone metric. Too many inch tools are coming
out of Boeing to
> convince me they do much in metric except the military
stuff.
> Getting standards in the early 19th century when the US
started to convert to interchangable parts must have been
interesting.
> <ugh>
>
> dave
>
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list
for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM,
and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com,
wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page:
http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
Discussion Thread
Jerry Kimberlin
2000-10-02 12:50:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Slightly off-topic : History behind lettered drills
dave engvall
2000-10-03 11:19:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Slightly off-topic : History behind lettered drills
Alvaro Fogassa
2000-10-03 11:49:10 UTC
Re: Slightly off-topic : History behind lettered drills
Ian Wright
2000-10-03 15:36:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Slightly off-topic : History behind lettered drills
Paul Corner
2000-10-03 16:38:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Slightly off-topic : History behind lettered drills
Jon Elson
2000-10-03 17:33:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Slightly off-topic : History behind lettered drills
Darrell
2000-10-03 20:06:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Slightly off-topic : History behind lettered drills
catboat15@a...
2000-10-03 21:00:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Slightly off-topic : History behind lettered drills
JanRwl@A...
2000-10-04 21:15:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Slightly off-topic : History behind lettered drills