Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:OK - you convinced me - was "Automated "Manual CNC"
Posted by
Ron Ginger
on 2000-10-06 07:36:15 UTC
Brian Collier wrote:
work is going to move to remove the lash. This is why I think all
software compensation for backlash is useless.
ron
>Sure, but as soon as the tool hits the work if there is backlash the
> Thank you once again for the informative answer!
>
> I am a little confused when you talk about backlash being a problem
> in my proposed set up. In open-loop or closed-loop with position
> feedback from the motor, I understand about backlash being a problem.
> The PC has no way of knowing the true position of the workpiece due
> to the backlash. However, with closed-loop with feedback from the
> table, couldn't the CNC program just work around it?
work is going to move to remove the lash. This is why I think all
software compensation for backlash is useless.
ron
Discussion Thread
Ron Ginger
2000-10-06 07:36:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:OK - you convinced me - was "Automated "Manual CNC"
Brian Collier
2000-10-06 11:08:57 UTC
Re: re:OK - you convinced me - was "Automated "Manual CNC"
Ron Ginger
2000-10-06 11:34:11 UTC
Re:OK - you convinced me - was "Automated "Manual CNC"
dave engvall
2000-10-06 16:05:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:OK - you convinced me - was "Automated "Manual CNC"
William Scalione
2000-10-06 21:45:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: OK - you convinced me - was "Automated "Manual CNC"
Jon Elson
2000-10-06 21:55:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:OK - you convinced me - was "Automated "Manual CNC"