Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re[2]: axis naming conventions
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-11-22 16:13:08 UTC
Smoke wrote:
expense flying people from all over the country to meetings where they
hashed out these details. I was just out of diapers when all this was
done. They need to at least cover the cost of printing and mailing
these documents.
Jon
> If the industry is so concerned about getting everyone to use the sameWell, I don't write the rules. The IEEE probably went to a great deal of
> conventions (which is good) then why are these "standards" copyrighted and
> must be PURCHASED in order to use them? Sounds to me like one particular
> group is attempting to force others to "their" standards at a substantial
> financial benefit to them!
>
> "Standards" should be free and available to anyone wishing to use
> them....otherwise they aren't really standards.
expense flying people from all over the country to meetings where they
hashed out these details. I was just out of diapers when all this was
done. They need to at least cover the cost of printing and mailing
these documents.
Jon
Discussion Thread
ballendo@y...
2000-11-22 04:12:54 UTC
Re[2]: axis naming conventions
Jeff Barlow
2000-11-22 08:32:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[2]: axis naming conventions
Hugh Currin
2000-11-22 09:24:18 UTC
Re: axis naming conventions
ballendo@y...
2000-11-22 14:12:55 UTC
Re: Re[2]: axis naming conventions
Jon Elson
2000-11-22 14:40:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re[2]: axis naming conventions
Smoke
2000-11-22 14:53:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re[2]: axis naming conventions
Jon Elson
2000-11-22 16:13:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re[2]: axis naming conventions