Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Ah, the 'bad ol' days'
Posted by
dave engvall
on 2000-11-27 08:09:23 UTC
Jon Elson wrote:
guess I was so happy to have something that worked that I never noticed the slowness.
Dave
> We loaded FOCAL, an interpreted language similar toFOCAL was indeed interpreted but was based on ALGOL and therefore block oriented. Users of Pascal would feel very comfortable. I
> some early minicomputer BASICs on it once, and it couldn't keep up with an
> ASR-33 teletype!
guess I was so happy to have something that worked that I never noticed the slowness.
Dave
Discussion Thread
Ken Jenkins
2000-11-26 19:41:43 UTC
Re: Ah, the 'bad ol' days'
Jeff Barlow
2000-11-26 20:01:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Ah, the 'bad ol' days'
dave engvall
2000-11-26 20:24:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Ah, the 'bad ol' days'
Jon Elson
2000-11-27 00:44:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Ah, the 'bad ol' days'
dave engvall
2000-11-27 08:09:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Ah, the 'bad ol' days'
Greg Nuspel
2000-11-27 08:23:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Ah, the 'bad ol' days'
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-11-27 10:37:53 UTC
Re: Ah, the 'bad ol' days'
JanRwl@A...
2000-11-27 14:43:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Ah, the 'bad ol' days'