Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc copyright??
Posted by
Paul Corner
on 2000-11-30 15:12:02 UTC
Ray,
How would you decide on who 'owns' the copyright to the 3D backplotter and
it's derivatives ?
(Me thinks this could get messy) <g>
Regards, Paul.
How would you decide on who 'owns' the copyright to the 3D backplotter and
it's derivatives ?
(Me thinks this could get messy) <g>
Regards, Paul.
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Ray wrote:
> The ONE area in this you DO have to be careful is the "add-ons"
> created by NON-Gov't employees: Ray Henrys' "backplotter", for
> example. I don't know under what "terms" he has released this code
> under?
>
> In fact the first tkbackplot -- the one with the buttons along the right
> edge was my copywrite. But that seemed messy to me so I released the
> revised one -- the one that pops up from tkemc -- in the public domain
> also. That one you are free to use any way that you please. (don't thank
> me, send money)
Discussion Thread
Art Fenerty
2000-11-28 17:29:36 UTC
emc copyright??
ballendo@y...
2000-11-28 18:46:14 UTC
emc copyright??
Jon Elson
2000-11-28 21:45:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc copyright??
Ray
2000-11-29 05:28:19 UTC
Re: emc copyright??
Art Fenerty
2000-11-29 06:37:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc copyright??
ballendo@y...
2000-11-29 14:50:25 UTC
Re: emc copyright??
ballendo@y...
2000-11-29 15:12:56 UTC
Re: Re: emc copyright??
Art Fenerty
2000-11-29 16:40:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: emc copyright??
Ray
2000-11-29 18:07:27 UTC
Re: Re: emc copyright??
Ray
2000-11-29 18:15:35 UTC
Re: emc copyright??
Paul Corner
2000-11-30 15:12:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc copyright??
Ray
2000-12-01 05:00:25 UTC
Re: Re: emc copyright??
Paul Corner
2000-12-01 12:26:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: emc copyright??
Ray
2000-12-01 21:02:32 UTC
Re: Re: Re: emc copyright??
Ian Wright
2000-12-02 02:02:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: emc copyright??
Brian Pitt
2000-12-02 03:32:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: emc copyright??