CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Re: emc copyright??

Posted by Ray
on 2000-11-29 18:07:27 UTC
From: ballendo@...
>Ray, Art,
<s>
>I followed your(Ray) link. I had read this "real time" awhile back.

>Did I miss something re: 6 axis vs. 3 axis interpreter???
>Are you talking copyright still? Or just new vs. old code?

That was a definite case of "right-turn Clyde." There are two
interpreters in the emc code now. The "standard" that we have been using
for a couple of years is a three axis only system.

The new interpreter is a full six axis. The rest of the emc code is not
quite ready for it so we set the extra to 0 position for now. But in
the system Art is building that should not be a problem.

Both are in the public domain.

Ray

Discussion Thread

Art Fenerty 2000-11-28 17:29:36 UTC emc copyright?? ballendo@y... 2000-11-28 18:46:14 UTC emc copyright?? Jon Elson 2000-11-28 21:45:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc copyright?? Ray 2000-11-29 05:28:19 UTC Re: emc copyright?? Art Fenerty 2000-11-29 06:37:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc copyright?? ballendo@y... 2000-11-29 14:50:25 UTC Re: emc copyright?? ballendo@y... 2000-11-29 15:12:56 UTC Re: Re: emc copyright?? Art Fenerty 2000-11-29 16:40:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: emc copyright?? Ray 2000-11-29 18:07:27 UTC Re: Re: emc copyright?? Ray 2000-11-29 18:15:35 UTC Re: emc copyright?? Paul Corner 2000-11-30 15:12:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc copyright?? Ray 2000-12-01 05:00:25 UTC Re: Re: emc copyright?? Paul Corner 2000-12-01 12:26:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: emc copyright?? Ray 2000-12-01 21:02:32 UTC Re: Re: Re: emc copyright?? Ian Wright 2000-12-02 02:02:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: emc copyright?? Brian Pitt 2000-12-02 03:32:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: emc copyright??