Re: emc copyright??
Posted by
ballendo@y...
on 2000-11-29 14:50:25 UTC
Art,
Jon's advice to talk with Fred is good.
But in this case, FREE REALLY MEANS FREE!
As I said before, just don't violate international treaties,
and "other" US laws.
You CAN sell EMC! AS EMC! Or as anything else you want. And you don't
have to give ANY credit to ANYONE. Having said that, your customers
might get a little "bent" if you're not adding any value, when or if
they find out. And the people you ask for help at NIST "might" not
think as well of you...
The ONE area in this you DO have to be careful is the "add-ons"
created by NON-Gov't employees: Ray Henrys' "backplotter", for
example. I don't know under what "terms" he has released this code
under?
The whole "stated, anyway :-)" point of EMC is to improve the
manufacturing industry in the good ole US of A! By providing
the "next generation controller" to machine builders, retrofitters
and manufacturing concerns.
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
'*******************************************************************
Jon's advice to talk with Fred is good.
But in this case, FREE REALLY MEANS FREE!
As I said before, just don't violate international treaties,
and "other" US laws.
You CAN sell EMC! AS EMC! Or as anything else you want. And you don't
have to give ANY credit to ANYONE. Having said that, your customers
might get a little "bent" if you're not adding any value, when or if
they find out. And the people you ask for help at NIST "might" not
think as well of you...
The ONE area in this you DO have to be careful is the "add-ons"
created by NON-Gov't employees: Ray Henrys' "backplotter", for
example. I don't know under what "terms" he has released this code
under?
The whole "stated, anyway :-)" point of EMC is to improve the
manufacturing industry in the good ole US of A! By providing
the "next generation controller" to machine builders, retrofitters
and manufacturing concerns.
Hope this helps.
Ballendo
'*******************************************************************
>As long as you aren't selling your version of EMC as a separate
>product, and as long as any notices declaring who wrote various
>parts of EMC are not removed, I don't think there is a problem.
>You could ask Fred Proctor at NIST ( proctor@c... ) for any guidance
>on this, as he is the top guy responsible for the project.
>Jon
Discussion Thread
Art Fenerty
2000-11-28 17:29:36 UTC
emc copyright??
ballendo@y...
2000-11-28 18:46:14 UTC
emc copyright??
Jon Elson
2000-11-28 21:45:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc copyright??
Ray
2000-11-29 05:28:19 UTC
Re: emc copyright??
Art Fenerty
2000-11-29 06:37:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc copyright??
ballendo@y...
2000-11-29 14:50:25 UTC
Re: emc copyright??
ballendo@y...
2000-11-29 15:12:56 UTC
Re: Re: emc copyright??
Art Fenerty
2000-11-29 16:40:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: emc copyright??
Ray
2000-11-29 18:07:27 UTC
Re: Re: emc copyright??
Ray
2000-11-29 18:15:35 UTC
Re: emc copyright??
Paul Corner
2000-11-30 15:12:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc copyright??
Ray
2000-12-01 05:00:25 UTC
Re: Re: emc copyright??
Paul Corner
2000-12-01 12:26:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: emc copyright??
Ray
2000-12-01 21:02:32 UTC
Re: Re: Re: emc copyright??
Ian Wright
2000-12-02 02:02:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: emc copyright??
Brian Pitt
2000-12-02 03:32:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: emc copyright??