CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: real granite machines!

Posted by dave engvall
on 2000-11-30 20:41:58 UTC
Doug Harrison wrote:

> - The concrete provided excellent vibration damping but has a
> tendency to separate from the steel housing, again due to that shrinkage
> problem. Using the concrete for mass is a good idea if you can get around
> this.
>
> Doug

Maybe what we need is an approach that casts steel anchors in the concrete and then when (...not if ?? ) the casting separates
fill the voids with epoxy composite. This is not to say that granite won't work and may be a better approach.
It is nice to dream but must get the conventional machine working with servos first. Only a few more weeks. (maybe).

Dave

Discussion Thread

Jon Elson 2000-11-29 21:24:34 UTC Re: real granite machines! dave engvall 2000-11-30 07:02:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: real granite machines! Joe Vicars 2000-11-30 07:12:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: real granite machines! Marcus & Eva 2000-11-30 08:23:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: real granite machines! Smoke 2000-11-30 10:55:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: real granite machines! Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2000-11-30 11:31:15 UTC Re: real granite machines! John D. Guenther 2000-11-30 11:45:56 UTC Re: real granite machines! Doug Harrison 2000-11-30 13:04:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: real granite machines! ballendo@y... 2000-11-30 20:04:39 UTC Re: Re: real granite machines! dave engvall 2000-11-30 20:41:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: real granite machines! dave engvall 2000-11-30 20:42:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: real granite machines! Ian Wright 2000-12-01 01:04:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: real granite machines! Jon Elson 2000-12-01 15:07:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: real granite machines!